Skip to main content

Table 1 The docking results (scores) of the studied compounds with Vemurafenib as the reference

From: In silico evaluation of some 4-(quinolin-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine derivatives as potent V600E-BRAF inhibitors with pharmacokinetics ADMET and drug-likeness predictions

Complex

MolDock scorea

Rerank scoreb

E-interactionc

E-Hbondd

LE1

LE3

1

− 137.788

− 108.491

− 154.195

− 2.500

− 5.103

− 4.018

2

− 138.199

− 103.557

− 137.910

− 0.616

− 4.936

− 3.698

3

− 143.249

− 120.404

− 163.471

− 8.473

− 4.940

− 4.152

4

− 138.935

− 94.500

− 153.642

− 1.523

− 4.791

− 3.259

5

167.246

128.011

183.969

8.146

5.575

4.267

6

− 135.974

− 105.232

− 159.953

− 1.568

− 4.532

− 3.508

7

− 133.878

− 106.025

− 158.937

− 3.538

− 4.463

− 3.534

8

− 139.191

− 113.258

− 156.641

− 1.325

− 4.640

− 3.775

9

158.484

126.258

172.123

6.156

4.802

3.826

10

156.937

129.661

176.571

5.696

4.756

3.929

11

165.157

140.478

194.665

4.850

5.161

4.390

Vem.

− 158.139

− 118.607

− 167.952

− 4.741

− 4.792

− 3.594

  1. aMoldock score was obtained from the PLP scoring functions with a new H-bond term and extra charge schemes [30]
  2. bRerank score is a linear combination of E-inter (Electrostatic, Van der Waals, H-bonding, steric) between the ligand and the protein target, and E-intra. (Electrostatic, Van der Waals, H-bonding, sp2–sp2, torsion,) of the ligand weighted by pre-defined coefficients [30]
  3. cE-interaction is the total energy between the protein and the pose
  4. dE-Hbond is Hbond energy. LE1 ligand efficiency-1(MolDock score/heavy atoms count), LE3 ligand efficiency 3(Rerank score/heavy atoms count)