From: Design, statistical optimization of Nizatidine floating tablets using natural polymer
Model R2 | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Predicted R2 | PRESS | s.d. | F value | p value | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mimosa (2%) based EGFMT | ||||||||
Response Y1 (floating lag time) | ||||||||
Linear | 0.9670 | 0.9576 | 0.9311 | 13.70 | 0.9686 | 102.51 | <ā0.0001 | Suggested |
Interactive | 0.9783 | 0.9674 | 0.9613 | 7.70 | 0.8482 | 3.13 | 0.1274 | Ā |
Quadratic | 0.9904 | 0.9783 | 0.9318 | 13.57 | 0.6922 | 2.50 | 0.1971 | Ā |
Response Y2 (swelling index at 1 h) | ||||||||
Linear | 0.9812 | 0.9758 | 0.9600 | 21.10 | 0.7367 | 182.29 | <ā0.0001 | Suggested |
Interactive | 0.9820 | 0.9729 | 0.9312 | 13.87 | 0.7788 | 0.2638 | 0.6259 | Ā |
Quadratic | 0.9915 | 0.9786 | 0.8954 | 8.07 | 0.6986 | 1.79 | 0.2781 | Ā |
Response Y3 (T100) time to release 100% of drug | ||||||||
Linear | 0.9896 | 0.9866 | 0.9790 | 4.00 | 0.50 | 333.49 | <ā0.0001 | Suggested |
Interactive | 0.9911 | 0.9866 | 0.9810 | 3.24 | 0.50 | 0.98 | 0.358 | Ā |
Quadratic | 0.9971 | 0.9935 | 0.9765 | 3.57 | 0.35 | 4.2 | 0.1036 | Ā |
Mimosa (1%) based EGFMT | ||||||||
Response Y1 (floating lag time) | ||||||||
Linear | 0.9077 | 0.8813 | 0.7743 | 40.76 | 1.19 | 34.41 | 0.0002 | Suggested |
Interactive | 0.9449 | 0.9173 | 0.8091 | 20.55 | 0.9944 | 4.04 | 0.0910 | Ā |
Quadratic | 0.9637 | 0.9183 | 0.6212 | 24.28 | 0.9880 | 1.04 | 0.4331 | Ā |
Response Y2 (swelling index at 1 h) | ||||||||
Linear | 0.8999 | 0.8713 | 0.8000 | 23.38 | 1.29 | 31.47 | 0.0003 | Ā |
Interactive | 0.9021 | 0.8513 | 0.6526 | 4.37 | 1.38 | 0.1310 | 0.7298 | Ā |
Quadratic | 0.9966 | 0.9923 | 0.9626 | 40.61 | 0.3160 | 55.32 | 0.0012 | Suggested |
Response Y3 (T100): time to release 100% of drug | ||||||||
Linear | 0.8885 | 0.8567 | 0.7929 | 12.20 | 0.96 | 23.89 | 0.0005 | Ā |
Interactive | 0.8928 | 0.8391 | 0.7426 | 4.00 | 1.03 | 0.24 | 0.6433 | Ā |
Quadratic | 0.9917 | 0.9814 | 0.9321 | 15.16 | 0.34 | 27.88 | 0.0005 | Suggested |