Skip to main content

Table 2 Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by using CP leaf and callus extract against various microorganisms. The data were statistically evaluated through one-way analysis of variance. The data represents mean ± standard deviation. Data for each column in the respective bacteria followed by the different letters (a to h) are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test [29] at P < 0.05. These letters (a to h) usually compare the means of different concentrations and the treatments

From: Impact of silver nanoparticles as antibacterial agent derived from leaf and callus of Celastrus paniculatus Willd

Name of the organisms

Concentrations

Zone of inhibition (mm)

Celastrus leaf sample

Celastrus callus sample

Plant extract

AgNPs

Callus extract

AgNPs

Escherichia coli

40 μl

13.06 ± 0.40a

19.50 ± 0.5d

15.83 ± 0.76b,c

20.16 ± 0.76d,e

50 μl

13.83 ± 0.76a

20.73 ± 0.87d,e,f

15.90 ± 0.49b,c

20.83 ± 0.85e,f

60 μl

15.23 ± 0.68b

21.66 ± 0.76f

16.66 ± 0.57c

23.00 ± 0.50g

Positive control

33.00 ± 1.00h

Negative control

0

Pseudomonas sp.

40 μl

14.50 ± 0.50a

19.16 ± 1.25d

15.83 ± 0.76b,c

20.50 ± 0.50e

50 μl

15.66 ± 0.76a,b,c

21.00 ± 1.00e

15.06 ± 0.60a,b

21.52 ± 0.50e,f

60 μl

15.73 ± 0.25a,b,c

21.67 ± 0.25e,f

16.83 ± 0.76c

22.33 ± 0.57g

Positive control

30.00 ± 0.50h

Negative control

0

Staphylococcus aureus

40 μl

14.66 ± 0.57b,c

19.00 ± 0.50d

14.00 ± 1.00b

20.50 ± 0.50e

50 μl

15.83 ± 0.76c

21.16 ± 1.04e,f

16.00 ± 1.00c

21.66 ± 1.52e,f

60 μl

0.00 ± 0.00a

22.16 ± 1.52f

0.00 ± 0.00a

21.50 ± 0.50e,f

Positive control

31.23 ± 1.07g

Negative control

0

Bacillus subtilis

40 μl

13.00 ± 1.00a

18.33 ± 0.57c,d

13.00 ± 1.00a

20.73 ± 0.75e

50 μl

14.16 ± 0.76ab

19.16 ± 0.57d

14.33 ± 0.76a,b

21.33 ± 1.25e

60 μl

15.56 ± 1.10b

21.33 ± 1.25e

17.16 ± 0.76c

24.00 ± 1.00f

Positive control

26.33 ± 0.57g

Negative control

0