Skip to main content

Table 5 The details of the druggable binding site, their docking score and binding energy, least complex energy and the main interaction showed amino acid residues at the binding site

From: Docking and dynamic simulation study of Crizotinib and Temozolomide drug with Glioblastoma and NSCLC target to identify better efficacy of the drug

Protein name and drug name

Type of docking

docking score

Binding energy (kcal/mol)

Complex energy (kcal/mol)

Interacting residues

2WGJ

PDB(P9)

72.1914

7.4427

− 11,266.0096

ARG1208

 

PDB(P4)

74.4989

− 16.3492

− 11,289.7872

MET1160

DRUG-TEMOZOLOMIDE

RC(S1,P6)

65.8739

20.7625

− 11,295.5088

ARG1227,GLU1127

RC (S1, P4)

67.5009

− 25.2079

− 11,302.4869

ARG1227

DIRECT(P4)

68.0813

− 27.8584

− 11,305.0830

PRO1158, MET1160

MOTIF(P1)

74.7354

− 32.2530

− 11,309.5066

ARG1208

 

MOTIF(P11)

56.0548

− 19.8256

− 11,292.9200

PRO1158, MET1160

3ZBF

PDB(P3)

60.5055

− 21.2784

− 11,597.8

LYS1980,ARG2083

 

PDB(P4)

58.5464

− 40.5732

− 11,659.6814

MET2029,GLU2027

DRUG-TEMOZOLOMIDE

S1(P4)

54.3362

− 55.3656

− 11,670.6518

ASP2102

S1(P9)

51.9164

− 38.8334

− 11,657.6084

LYS1980

DIRECT(P5)

56.4637

− 12.0296

− 11,627.0789

GLU2027,MET2029

MOTIF(P1)

71.1408

− 29.3576

− 11,648.4805

HIS2006

2XP2

PDB(P3)

61.6198

− 3.4005

− 11,693.1778

GLU1197,MET1199

DRUG-TEMOZOLOMIDE

RC(S1,P2)

60.1738

− 44.4725

− 11,734.7565

ARG1275, GLU1167

RC(S1, P4)

− 59.7869

− 59.7869

− 11,750.1009

LYS1150,ARG1275

DIRECT(P3)

61.0851

− 25.9935

− 11,715.3869

MET1199

MOTIF(P2)

52.4923

− 27.8563

− 11,717.0798

LYS1150,ASP1249,ASP1270