From: Microsponges: a breakthrough tool in pharmaceutical research
S. No. | Method of preparation | Pros | Cons | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liquid–liquid suspension polymerization | It may be adjusted to a single-step or two-step technique for drug loading | (a) Solvent traces and unreacted monomers can be trapped; (b) the structure is non-uniform; (c) the reaction time needed for monomers is considerable; and (d) thermosensitive medicines necessitate two-step methods | |
2 | Quasi-emulsion solvent diffusion | High drug loading, no monomer entrapment, low solvent traces, MDS size is readily regulated by regulating the stirring rate, and spherical microsponges are obtained | (a) Not appropriate for loading water-soluble medicines, and (b) the monomer reaction takes a long time | |
3 | Multiple-emulsion solvent diffusion | (a) Water-soluble drugs can be loaded effectively, and (b) proteins and peptides may be entrapped using this approach | Requires the use of water-insoluble surfactants, which can be found in the form of residues in the resultant MDS | |
4 | Addition of porogen | Extremely porous structure with well-distributed and interconnected pores | Disruption in structure may occur | |
5 | Lyophilization | Method is simple and quick, and the results are repeatable | To get rid of the organic solvent remnants, vigorous washing is required | |
6 | Ultrasound-assisted production | No solvent traces, produce rapid and reproducible results | It is possible that an irregular structure may emerge, necessitating the use of cross-linking chemicals, which may be harmful |