Delivery route | Advantages | Disadvantages | Present FDA and research approved examples | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Systemic | Oral | Simplicity of use | Systemic adverse effects | Â | [8] |
IV | Low cost Good Patient compliance Minimal systemic adverse effects | Low ocular bioavailability (1-2%) | Intravenous administration of PLA-PEG chains with cell-penetrating peptide nanoparticles enhanced light-triggered local delivery of drug to the infected choroid * Intravenous nanoparticles loaded with doxorubicin dramatically reduced the size of neovascular lesions * | [12] | |
Topical | Ointment | Low cost | Therapeutic doses can’t be delivered to the retina owing to the existence of dynamic and static barriers | A dexamethasone-eluting contact lens achieved sustained therapeutic levels of dexamethasone to the retina 200-fold greater than hourly administered dexamethasone drops * | [127] |
Eye drops | Simplicity of use | Low therapeutic efficacy with amount less than 5% of the drugs diffusing through the eye following administration | An in situ thermosensitive hydrogel decreased laser-induced choroidal neovascularization in the posterior segment of the eyes of rats and pigs* | [100] | |
Gels | Low systemic side effects |  | DEXTENZA®, a dexamethasone intra-canalicular inserted into the lower lacrimal punctum, showed good effectiveness in treating pain and ocular inflammation during eye surgery along with ocular itching accompanied by allergic conjunctivitis ** | [126] | |
Eye Drops with nano/micro systems | Easily fabricated Good patient compliance | Â | Â | [103] | |
Peri-ocular | Injections or implants inserted within the orbital rim of the eyeball (ex: sclera) | Less invasive, with less risks and retinal impairment, compared to intravitreal injections. | Lower concentrations are attained as compared to intravitreal injections/ implants | An iontophoretic hydrogel device improved the transport of intraocular nanoparticles and macromolecules to posterior eye segments via trans-scleral channels up to 300 times * | [127] |
Intra-cameral | Implants or injections administered to the anterior segment of the eyeball | Cost-effective and efficient The optimal drug’s dosage is administered. Reduced systemic and ocular surface adverse effects in comparison with topical administration Circumvents the challenging barrier of the cornea. | Possibility of triggering toxic anterior segment syndrome. Endothelial cells of the cornea may be harmed. Invasive method. | DURYSTA™, an FDA approved biodegradable intra-cameral implant, containing bimatoprost for the management of ocular hypertension patients ** DEXYCU™, the first FDA-approved anti-inflammatory drug for use after cataract surgery using dexamethasone intra-cameral injectable suspension ** | [128] |
Suprachoroidal | Microneedles | Higher bioavailability than periocular routes | Potential tissue damage | XIPERE®, an injectable suspension of triamcinolone acetonide administered into the suprachoroidal space (SCS) ** Microinjector®, an FDA-approved delivery system, given to SCS®, and used for the management of uveitis macular edema ** | [13] |
 | Suprachoroidal injected in situ gel | Targeting with high bioavailability in the retinal pigment epithelium and choroid. | Fabrication difficulty | In rabbit eyes, a microneedle-based device aided by iontophoresis boosted posterior targeting with efficiency more than 30% compared to nanoparticles in the SCS * | [77] |
Intravitreal | Injection | Increased drug concentrations in vitreous and retinal regions. | Painful | Ozurdex®, an intravitreal FDA approved dexamethasone biodegradable implant used for the management of uveitis and diabetic macular edema ** | [124] |
Implant | Minimal systemic side effects | -Frequent injections can cause complications -Difficulty in implant's application and removal -Implant may result in acidity in the microenvironment | ILUVIEN®, an approved non-biodegradable, injectable corticosteroid implant comprising Fluocinolone acetonide used for the management of macular edema** | [122] |