Skip to main content

Table 4 Participant attitude toward OAC therapy in NVAF patients

From: Assessing physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and practice on anticoagulant therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Syrian insights

Attitude items

Frequency

Percentage %

The type of atrial fibrillation would affect doctors’ initiate anticoagulant therapy and choose oral anticoagulants

Strongly disagree

47

9.5

Somewhat disagree

64

12.9

Not sure

118

23.7

Somewhat agree

177

35.6

Strongly agree

91

18.3

It is necessary to use the stroke score tool to assess the risk of stroke in AF patients before anticoagulant therapy

Strongly disagree

1

0.2

Somewhat disagree

12

2.4

Not sure

64

12.9

Somewhat agree

186

37.4

Strongly agree

234

47.1

It is necessary to use the bleeding score tool to assess the risk of bleeding in AF patients before anticoagulant therapy

Strongly disagree

5

1.0

Somewhat disagree

8

1.6

Not sure

55

11.1

Somewhat agree

161

32.4

Strongly agree

268

53.9

I am more concerned about the risk of bleeding in AF patients than the risk of stroke in AF patients

Strongly disagree

52

10.5

Somewhat disagree

132

26.6

Not sure

122

24.5

Somewhat agree

143

28.8

Strongly agree

48

9.7

I think it’s important for AF patients to “understand the risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with AF”

Strongly disagree

4

0.8

Somewhat disagree

8

1.6

Not sure

48

9.7

Somewhat agree

155

31.2

Strongly agree

282

56.7

I think it’s important for AF patients to “reduce the risk of stroke and bleeding due to atrial fibrillation”

Strongly disagree

3

0.6

Somewhat disagree

10

2.0

Not sure

51

10.3

Somewhat agree

151

30.4

Strongly agree

282

56.7

It is safe to maintain the INR between 2.0 and 3.0 for warfarin anticoagulation therapy in NVAF patients

Strongly disagree

18

3.6

Somewhat disagree

31

6.2

Not sure

122

24.5

Somewhat agree

171

34.4

Strongly agree

155

31.2

It is necessary to tell AF patients about medication and food that affect warfarin's anticoagulant effects

Strongly disagree

1

0.2

Somewhat disagree

10

2.0

Not sure

57

11.5

Somewhat agree

134

27.0

Strongly agree

295

59.4

I fully understand the views of AF patients on reducing the risk of stroke and bleeding caused by warfarin therapy

Strongly disagree

1

0.2

Somewhat disagree

20

4.0

Not sure

70

14.1

Somewhat agree

228

45.9

Strongly agree

178

35.8

I think the new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) has a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin

Strongly disagree

6

1.2

Somewhat disagree

22

4.4

Not sure

130

26.2

Somewhat agree

183

36.8

Strongly agree

156

31.4

I think the new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) is easier to administer than warfarin

Strongly disagree

5

1.0

Somewhat disagree

32

6.4

Not sure

141

28.4

Somewhat agree

143

28.8

Strongly agree

176

35.4

I hope to have more Knowledge to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of stroke, bleeding risk and anticoagulation r

Strongly disagree

1

0.2

Somewhat disagree

10

2.0

Not sure

60

12.1

Somewhat agree

159

32.0

Strongly agree

267

53.7

I think doctors can improve the standard anticoagulant treatment rate in AF patients after training atrial fibrillation

Strongly disagree

1

0.2

Somewhat disagree

4

0.8

Not sure

47

9.5

Somewhat agree

128

25.8

Strongly agree

317

63.8