Skip to main content

A systematic review on the biological evaluation of Calotropis procera (Aiton) Dryand

Abstract

Background

Humans have used plants as a safe and effective medicine for a wide range of ailments ever since the earliest days of civilization. Calotropis procera potential as a treatment for a variety of ailments has been known for quite some time. This xerophytic, upright shrub grows to a height of about 6 m and can be found in the tropics of Africa and Asia. Its parts have been used to cure a variety of ailments, including rheumatism, fever, dysentery, diabetes, malaria, asthma, and many more. Here, we provide a synopsis of the available biological data and discuss the possible ways in which Calotropis procera could be used as a novel platform for the treatment of a wide range of diseases.

Main body

High antioxidant, antiinflammatory, antianalgesic, antimicrobial, antimalaria, antidiabetic, wound-healing, hepato-protective, nerve-recovery, antiulcer, insecticidal, and anticancer effects have been observed in the latex. The research also found that excessive intake has negative health effects.

Conclusion

The review discovered that the biological evaluation of C. procera in vitro and in vivo animal models was well documented. Human safety and efficacy, however, have yet to be thoroughly tested, and additional well-designed clinical trials are required to confirm preclinical findings. It is essential to establish a standard dose and assure its safety.

Background

The use of plant-based remedies to treat human and animal illness dates back thousands of years [1]. In many cultures, plants have long been relied upon as an effective means of disease prevention and treatment. Medicinal plants are still the primary source of healthcare in many developing world areas [2]. World health organization (WHO) reports that 80% of the world's population, mostly in developing nations, relies on traditional medicines to treat common health problems [3]. They are used medicinally and as a food source in almost every culture. What's more impressive is that plants provide the basis for nearly 25% of today's pharmaceuticals [4]. They are regarded as invaluable sources of pharmaceutical products including herbal medicines, and their use contributes significantly to primary healthcare delivery. Bioactive plant products have been a major research and development focus in the food and pharmaceutical industries [5]. Calotropis procera, it is common in Indonesia, Malaysia, China, and the Indian subcontinent [6]. The medicinal properties of the plant have long been recognized, and its parts have been used to treat a wide range of conditions, including rheumatism, painful muscular spasms, fever, dysentery, diabetes, malaria, asthma, and more. In recent years, studying synergies in phyto-medicine has emerged as an important new field of study. Extensive pharmacological studies were conducted on the biological activities of plant extracts and natural products derived from these plants. Exploring the relevant scientific literature is essential for understanding the potential of industrial use of Calotropis procera. With an eye toward industrial formulation of health products, this study aimed to compile a comprehensive literature review on the biological potential of its components. This study will facilitate the dissemination of information about the plant's potential applications, which in turn will guide future decisions in the fields of food science, herbal medicine, and pharmaceuticals.

Main text

Search strategy, inclusion, and exclusion criteria

Online databases like Science Direct, PubMed, Springer, Wiley, Sage, Google Scholar, and Hindawi combed through primary scientific research publications to glean relevant data. Selection criteria: a secondary verification of the plant name authenticity was performed using the website World Flora Online (http://www.worldfloraonline.org). Papers with only plant accepted names were considered. We used the following terms as search criteria: antioxidant, Calotropis, procera, traditional medicine, C. procera, antidiabetic, antibacterial, medicine, toxicity, antiviral, antimicrobial, ethnopharmacology, cytotoxic activity, chemical composition, isolation, compounds, HPLC, FTIR, GCMS analysis. We did not incorporate any information that may have come from questionable websites into our investigation. We also omitted articles that were reviewed with C. procera theses, or were written in a language besides English.

Description and origin

Traditional medicine has used Calotropis procera, a plant belonging to the Asclepediaceae family. It's a shrub that produces latex and thrives in the wild despite the fact that it's constantly exposed to adverse weather [7]. When damaged, the plant secretes a milky latex that is most abundant in its aerial parts. It protects the plant from harm and is full of useful secondary compounds and enzymes [8]. Swallow wort in English, madar in Hindi, and Tumpapiya in Hausa are just some of the common names for this plant. It reaches a height of 2.5–6 m and has a soft woody, upright form. It prefers warm climates, dry, sandy, and alkaline soils, and is therefore widespread across the globe (Fig. 1). It thrives in a variety of other environments, including landfills, abandoned lots, wastelands, roadside ditches, and sand dunes [9].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pictures of Calotropis procera collected from wild

Biological activity

Multiple biological assessments of the plant's constituent parts were performed, each employing a unique assay to confirm the plant's efficacy, as discovered by the research (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Diseases treated with different parts of Calotropis procera

Antioxidant

When oxygen is used to produce cellular energy, a redox process occurs that releases free radicals. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) that make up the free radicals include hydroxyl radical, hydrogen peroxide, and super oxide anion [2]. To guarantee the efficacy of such antioxidant materials, the antioxidant properties of plant extracts were evaluated in several model systems using several different indices (Table 1). The DPPH radical scavenging assay found that the extracts had high levels of free radical scavenging activity (42–90%). It was found that the concentration affected the percentage of metal ions chelated (16–95%) [10]. At 500 µg/mL, the methanol extract showed the highest scavenging activity (83.63%) against ferric thiocyanide, followed by hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical assays, and then the DPPH assay, which showed the lowest activity (50.82%) [11]. Dose-dependent reductions in TBARS levels were observed after 31 days of treatment with dry latex. TBARS levels were brought down to normal levels in both the DL 400 mg/kg and glibenclamide groups [12]. The highest levels of antioxidant capacity were found in lyophilized latex extracts (IC50 = 0.060 mg/mL), while the lowest levels were found in extracts from field-grown plant roots (IC50 = 0.27 mg/mL) [13]. The aqueous flower extract was the most powerful radical scavenger (IC50 = 85 μg/mL), while the ethanol flower extract was the least effective (IC50 = 142 μg/mL) [14]. The DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) was the highest (95%) in the ethyl acetate extract, lowest (86% in dichloromethane), and highest (760%) in water, lowest (32%) in methanol, and lowest (24%) in hexane. The extract of ethyl acetate is the most effective at scavenging ABTS (94%), followed by the extract of water (86%) [15]. 35–39% of free radicals were neutralized by the substance [16]. The isolated compound showed the highest level of inhibition (51.7%), followed by methanol (80%) and water (29.2%) [17]. Using the DPPH radical scavenging assay, the antioxidant activity of both samples was determined to be 81.16 and 80.97% inhibition, respectively [18]. Against DPPH radicals, the aqueous methanol extract showed a very high scavenging activity of 85.5% in vitro [19]. In terms of DPPH scavenging activity (88.19%) and LPOI activity (89.58%), the ethanolic flower extract came out on top, while the aqueous flower extract had the most reducing power (1.827) [20]. Flavanol glycosides, cardinolides, and lignans have all been found in the latex of this species, all of which may contribute to its antioxidant properties [21]. The location of phenolics' functional groups around the nucleus determines their ability to scavenge free radicals and function as antioxidants [22]. The number and arrangement of H-donating hydroxyl groups are the most important structural factors that govern the antioxidant potential of phenolics [22]. Active hydrogen donor ability of hydroxylated substitutions in calotropogenin, calotropin, and calotoxin may account for some of the plant's potential antioxidant properties [23]. It's possible that some effects might be triggered by other active substances. Even though numerous recognized chemicals were discovered, it is still unclear how much each of them contributed to the current levels of antioxidant activity. These results from the present investigation point to the possibility of cooperative or antagonistic interactions between these active chemicals' antioxidant capacities. As a result, more research is needed to determine the most prominent compounds and learn more about the mechanisms and synergistic effects of these substances. This study's findings demonstrated conclusively that latex of C. procera has strong antioxidant activity against a range of in vitro antioxidant systems.

Anti-inflammatory activity

The use of therapeutic plants in folk medicine for the treatment of common illnesses including malaria, inflammation, colds, fever, cough, and other medicinal claims are now supported by solid scientific data, which has led to a substantial increase in interest in these plants recently. The inflammatory response is a protective mechanism activated by injured or infected tissues. It is common during the healing process and can also be a problem on its own. Redness, swelling, discomfort, heat, and loss of function are all symptoms of inflammation. An abundance of chemical mediators, such as kinins, eicosanoids, complement proteins, histamine, and monokines, trigger and regulate the inflammatory events underlying these symptoms. Calotropis procera plant have been used medicinally for centuries to treat inflammation-related disorders and/or to manage the inflammatory symptoms of various diseases. When administered at 5 mg/rat, dramatically decreased oedema caused by carrageenin by 71% (p < 0.005) and formalin by 32% (p < 0.05) [24]. Substantial dose-related activity was shown for a chloroform-soluble fraction in pharmacologic models of carrageenin-induced pedal oedema, cotton pellet granuloma, and formaldehyde-induced arthritis in rats (p < 0.001) [25]. The extract (100 mg/kg b.w.) was more efficient than Indomethacin at avoiding the formation of paw oedema [26]. After treatment with MeDL, colonic mucosal damage was significantly reduced in colitic rats, and tissue levels of oxidative stress markers and proinflammatory mediators were restored, as seen by macroscopic and microscopic examinations [27]. The IC50 values for compound 4 were 7.6 µM against 5-LOX and 2.7 µM against 15-LOX, making it the compound with the highest antiinflammatory action. [28]. The extract had a dramatic antiinflammatory effect at dosages of 100 and 200 mg/kg. The extract demonstrated 21.6 and 71.6% inhibition at the doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg, respectively, whereas the conventional medication dexamethasone reduced e-Complete Freunds Adjuvant-induced arthritis by 99% [29]. Daily administration of MeDL (50 and 500 mg/kg) considerably reduced the inflammatory response and improved the joint abnormalities seen in arthritic rats [30]. In vivo studies using chloroform and hydroalcoholic extracts showed significant antiinflammatory efficacy at doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg, respectively[31]. The plant, C. procera, is a potential source of antiinflammatory agents in in vitro and in vivo animal models, which support its traditional usage in the management of inflammation. Non-protein and protein components of latex are responsible for its antiinflammatory effects [27]. The molecular basis for the antiinflammatory effects of a pure chemical or crude extract (1) Tyrosine kinase receptors are induced by several pathologies and stresses (2) which then stimulate IKKs (3) Additionally, active IKKs phosphorylate the inactive IκBα-NF-κB complex. (4) A phosphorylated form of IκBα is ubiquitylated and eventually destroyed. (5) Chemical or crude extract blocks the entry of the active form of NF-κB into the nucleus. (6) which promotes the expression of genes involved in (6a), adhesion molecules, receptors, chemokines, and cytokines all have a role in (6b) growth, proliferation of cells and differentiation (7) Arachidonic acid can be converted into prostaglandin with the help of Cox2, but a pure compound or crude extract will prevent this from happening. (8) This inflammation is caused by prostaglandins (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Antiinflammatory mechanism of action of crude extract or pure compounds from C. procera

Antibacterial activity

The steadily rising number of microorganisms that are resistant to chemical antimicrobial drugs poses a serious threat to the control of infectious diseases, even though new antibiotics are being synthesized steadily by industry. As a result, new multi-resistant bacterial strains emerge, which poses a serious threat, especially to those with compromised immune systems. As a result, natural plant products serve as a constant source of inspiration for the development of bioactive antimicrobial agents that have low toxicity, a broad spectrum, and good pharmacokinetics and may be employed in clinical settings without requiring any chemical modification. There has been a recent push to publicize the use of plants as alternative medicines for combating infectious diseases. Promising antibacterial activities were observed in these natural compounds (Table 1). For Staphylococcus saprophyticus and S. aureus, the greatest inhibitory zones for aqueous leaf extracts at 500 μg/well were 22 mm and 10 mm, respectively [32]. Against all five of the tested strains, proceragenin has shown activity. The zone of inhibition at doses of 150 and 200 mcg per well was between 20 and 35 mm, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the sensitive species was between 100 and 150 mcg [33]. The most effective inhibition (11 mm) against Escherichia coli was seen in the leaves after they were extracted with ethanol [6]. The MIC for E. coli E1 at 511 μg/mL showed greater antibacterial effectiveness when methanol extracts were used [34]. The inhibitory zone against E. coli has a diameter of 9.8 mm at 100 μg/mL Cuonp, which is bigger than the zone seen in the control without nanoparticles [35]. At a concentration of 250 μg/mL, the water-soluble extract exhibited strong antibacterial activity against the pathogens Clostridium perfringens and Streptococcus faecalis [36]. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes were significantly inhibited by the extract, with inhibition zones measuring more than 15 mm in diameter [37]. Overall, the test organisms were effectively inhibited by the ethanolic latex extract, with B. subtilis showing the largest zone of inhibition (21 mm) [38]. At 100 μg/mL of an ethanol extract, the maximum zone of inhibition against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was observed [39]. Ethanol performed much better than chloroform and water (p < 0.05). Latex ethanolic extract showed the biggest zone of inhibition (14 mm) when tested against E. coli with 9 mm zone [40]. The largest inhibition zones against B. subtilis when utilizing leaf and bark extracts made with 50% methanol were 20 and 21.66 mm [41]. All fractions were effective at inhibiting Klebsiella pneumonia. The most effective flower extract fractions are the n-hexane and ether fractions, which had inhibition zones of 23 and 24 mm, respectively [42]. The MIC of the ethanolic extract of leaves was 1000–2000 μg/mL, but the MBC of the ethanolic extract of latex was 2000 μg/mL [43]. The crude flavonoid fraction has shown the maximum efficacy, with inhibition zones' diameters against the investigated bacterial strains ranging from 15 to 28 mm [44]. C. procera antibacterial activity may be due to one or more components of the latex, either alone or in concert with others [45]. The latex of C. procera contains a wide variety of compounds, including proceroside, proteolytic enzymes, syriogenine, cardenolides, carbohydrates, cardioactive glycosides calactin, calotropain, calotoxin, and alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, and procerain, a stable cysteine protease [45]. It is theorized that the synergistic effects of a variety of bioactive compounds and their byproducts found in plant extracts contribute to the improved efficacy of numerous extracts. Specifically, CuONPs cause protein denaturation and cell death in bacteria by releasing Copper (CU) ions from nanoparticles, which bind efficiently to the negatively charged bacterial cell wall and break it (Fig. 4). The released Cu ions from the nanoparticles may bind to the negatively charged bacterial cell wall, causing it to rupture and, in turn, leading to protein denaturation and cell death [35]. This study provides evidence of the plant's antibacterial properties and suggests it may be useful in the treatment of bacterial diseases in humans and other animals.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mechanism of action of C. procera part nanoparticles on bacteria

Antifungal activity

Despite the great developments in human medicine, infectious diseases created by microorganisms like fungi continue to pose a significant threat to public health. Although fungal infections may seem manageable under optimal hygiene conditions, the use of antifungal drugs has led to the almost inevitable emergence of resistant strains of the fungi they were designed to combat. Once a microorganism has developed resistance to an antimicrobial drug, it can no longer be treated with that drug, which can have serious consequences in the clinic. The increasing prevalence of drug-resistant fungal illnesses has increased the urgency of developing effective alternatives to chemosynthetic drugs for treating human illness. Extracts that prove useful may pave the way for new, eco-friendly antifungal drugs. Of the three extracts tested, the aqueous one was the weakest. On the other hand, the extracts made with ethanol and chloroform performed exceptionally well. An ethanol extract of latex proved to be the most effective antifungal agent against Candida albicans. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for this ethanol extract was 5–20 mg/mL [40]. With inhibitory zones measuring 30 mm in diameter, the crude flavonoid fraction was the most efficient against C. albicans [44]. Treatment with LAg-NPs caused T. rubrum, C. albican, and A. terreus to grow by 24 mm, 26 mm, and 23 mm, respectively [46]. The average diameter of a fungal colony exposed to CuONPs at a concentration of 100 μg/mL was 3.6 mm, and the colony size barely altered. As opposed to the control's 21.2 mm, three different studies with 30 and 50 μg/mL demonstrated inhibition of 17 and 14.3 mm, respectively [35]. All extracts prevent all organisms from proliferating. The MIC of the latex extract ranged from 5 to 7 mg/mL. For leaf extract, the MIC ranged from 11 to 15 mg/mL [38]. All peptidases that were tested had IC50 values of roughly 50 μg/mL for the two tested fungi [47]. The crude extract proved effective against E. flocosum and T. gypseum at a concentration of 4.0 mg/mL [48]. The lowest inhibitory and fungicidal values, respectively, were 0.5 and 0.9 mg/mL, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/mL (Table 1). Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms include enzymatic changes in antibody activation and receptor modifications, as well as restrictions on drug delivery to susceptible hosts of pathogens[48]. The mechanism of action revealed CuONPs are able to penetrate fungal hyphae and destroy them by interfering with DNA replication and protein synthesis at the macromolecular level [35]. The amount of NPs used to suppress the fungus is also crucial because larger NPs have higher concentrations that cause enhanced membrane permeability and cell death. Fungi are inhibited by Calotropis procera in vitro. The effectiveness in the treatment of fungal infections, however, has not been demonstrated in clinical trials.

Anthelmintic activity

A major contributor to significant production losses in grazing animals, helminthiasis, is one of the most significant animal illnesses worldwide. As a result of weak management methods and control measures, the disease is disproportionately widespread in underdeveloped countries. A multimodal strategy that incorporates both long- and short-term anthelmintic treatment is necessary for effective helminth management. Natural product controls have been investigated because of a rise in anthelmintic-resistant parasites (Table 1). When exposed to either fresh or aqueous extracts of dried latex, both spontaneous motility (paralysis) and pin-evoked responses were reduced in a dose-dependent manner. 100 mg/mL (aqueous extract of dried latex) and 100% of the standard dose (300 mg/mL) produced results similar to those achieved with 3% piperazine (fresh latex) [49]. Sheep treated with aqueous extract (3 g/kg) or crude powder (3 g/kg) for 7 or 10 days experienced an 88 and 77% reduction in egg count, respectively. The methanolic extract group experienced the least severe drop in egg count, at 20%, on day 7 post-treatment [50]. The discovered activities should be confirmed through additional studies, and the individual compounds should be isolated for a deeper dive into the underlying processes. In addition, the extract's therapeutic potential must be assessed throughout a broad range of concentrations to establish the optimum therapeutic doses and treatment duration.

Anti-diarrheal activity

A primary contributor to both child mortality and morbidity is diarrhea, which is characterized by three or more watery or loose stools per day [51]. Diarrhea is a factor in one out of every ten fatalities of children under five worldwide [51]. Children in sub-Saharan and South Asian nations have a higher rate of diarrhea-related mortality (78%) than those in other developing nations. Scientists' interest in natural product-based drug development has been rekindled considering the widespread emergence of resistance to standard therapeutic drugs among many prevalent diseases. For thousands of years, people have relied on medicinal herbs as a natural remedy for health issues. Natural compounds originating from plants, or chemicals that mimic their effects, are the basis for many modern pharmaceuticals. Decreased bowel motion by 2.2 times as much as the castor oil-treated control group (6.8) minimized castor oil-induced diarrhea and kept the bowels from moving too frequently [52]. More scientific investigation is needed.

Antimalarial activity

Malaria is one of the most widespread infectious diseases in the tropics. Approximately 1.5–3 million individuals lose their lives every year due to malaria infections, out of an annual infection rate of 300–500 million [53]. The rapid global spread of malaria strains resistant to numerous drugs has made the need for novel antimalarial an urgent public health priority [54]. The IC50 values for the ethanolic extracts of the flowers and buds were 0.11 to 0.47 mg/mL against P. falciparum and 0.52–1.22 mg/mL against CQ-resistant strains (Table 1). The percentage of inhibition against MRC 20 ranged from 7.51 to 61.38% within a dose range of 62–125 mg/mL, while the percentage of inhibition against MRC 76 aged between 3.437 and 41.08%. These results were seen for flower, bud, and root fractions [54].

Antidiabetic activity

A rising number of people are developing diabetes mellitus, and the associated death rate keeps climbing. Insulin deficiency, insulin resistance, or both contribute to the metabolic abnormalities in carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins that define diabetes mellitus. It is estimated by the International Diabetes Federation that there are currently 41 million people with diabetes in India, with that number expected to rise to 70 million by the year 2025 as the prevalence of diabetes mellitus continues to skyrocket around the world [55]. The use of medicinal plants with hypoglycemic effects has been widely documented to be beneficial in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Most prospective lead candidates for future drug development programs can be found in natural products. Oral administration of 100 and 400 mg/kg of dry latex per day resulted in a decrease in blood glucose and an increase in hepatic glycogen content. Additionally, the diabetic rats' daily water intake was decreased to that of the non-diabetic rats, which helped to arrest their weight loss. Normal rats had blood glucose levels of 11.5 mmol/l (p < 0.01), while the diabetic rats had 12.9 mmol/l (p < 0.01). [12]. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the 80% ethanolic extract for various enzymes ranged from 0.78 mg/mL for beta-glucosidase to 0.93 mg/mL for alpha-amylase [56]. When compared to the control group's mean glucose level of 15.5 mmol/L, the leaf extract treated group's mean glucose level of 5.9 mmol/L (p < 0.05) was considerably lower [57]. Chronic administration of Calotropis procera root methanol, stem methanol, and leaf ethyl acetate extracts in 100 and 250 mg/kg doses resulted in a substantial (p < 0.01) reduction in mechanical hyperalgesia, thermal hyperalgesia, tactile allodynia, and HbA1C% level in Streptozotocin diabetic rats [58]. Antioxidant action, insulin level interference, and the protein kinase B and AMP-activated protein kinase enzymatic pathways have all been proposed as potential mechanisms of action [21]. Another possible mechanism: Pure compounds or crude extracts will produce inflammatory cytokines, which will cause microphages to undergo apoptosis in the blood and eventually release secretory insulin. On the other hand, stimulation of dendritic cells in the brain will signal the release of insulin due to hypoglycemia there. However, it is possible that the presence of fat that covers the insulin receptor contributes to insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus by preventing the interaction between the insulin receptor in the cells and insulin release. Complications from diabetes mellitus are highlighted in the state shown in Fig. 5: Nephropathy, Retinopathy, and Neuropathy all result in harm to the nervous system (damage to nephrons).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Mechanism of action of C. procera parts against Hypoglycemia

Wound healing activity

As a result of damage to the skin or other soft tissues, the body undergoes a repair process known as wound healing. When the skin is damaged, the underlying cells undergo an inflammatory response and ramp up collagen production. In time, new epithelial cells form. Once a day, for seven days, a sterile latex solution (20 µL each time) was applied topically. The wound size was reduced as a result of the latex's stimulation of collagen, DNA, and protein synthesis, and epithelization [59]. Normal and dexamethasone-treated rats showed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) decrease in epithelialization time after administration of the extract. This cut down the time needed to complete the task from 28 days to between 17 and 18 days. The consumption of the same extract led to similar increases in breaking strength in dexamethasone-treated rats [60]. After 7 days, the wounds were much smaller in the 50% latex in the honey and triamcinolone groups, and smaller still after 14 and 21 days [61]. According to the plant's phytochemistry, it contains triterpenoids -amyrin, flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, cardenolide anthocyanins, mudarine, lupeol, -sitosterol, flavanols, resin, potent bacteriolytic enzyme called calactin, a nontoxic proteolytic enzyme called calotropin, and a wax [62]. Strength upon breaking was much improved by the extract. The rate of wound contraction was also greatly accelerated, and epithelialization occurred more quickly in extract-treated wounds.

Hepatoprotective activity

Liver diseases are widely recognized as one of the world's most pressing public health concerns [63]. The current medical management of these conditions is inadequate despite their high rates of prevalence, morbidity, and mortality [64]. Historically, it has been believed that medicinal plants, particularly those with long histories of traditional use, contain a wealth of untapped potential in the form of new, effective drugs that could aid in the treatment of liver conditions. These results demonstrated that CP has a hepatoprotective effect against INH and RMP administration, protecting the liver from long-term toxicity [65]. Hydro-ethanolic extract (200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg) therapy dramatically increased unusually low levels of biochemical markers [66] (Table 1).

Antiulcer activity

Gastric and duodenal ulcers are subtypes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), the most common GI condition. Every year, PUD is responsible for around 15 thousand deaths [67]. Both DL and MeDL reduced gastric acidity in the pyloric ligation model, with DL reducing it to 163 mequiv./l and MeDL reducing it to 201 mequiv./l. In this model, the gastric pH was raised by these extracts, but the gastric mucosa was not protected (Table 1). Both the 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg doses of the extracts under study demonstrated dose-dependent antiulcerative colitis potential when administered to rats for 5 days in a row following acetic acid-induced colitis [68]. The extract considerably decreased the severity of gastric ulcers that were generated in rats by absolute alcohol, aspirin, reserpine, and serotonin [69]. Histamine also greatly prevented the stomach mucosa from being damaged by aspirin in pyloric-ligated rats, demonstrating the similar protective effect that resulted in duodenal ulcers in guinea pigs [69].

Insecticidal efficacy

Recently, there has been a heightened awareness of the risks associated with using synthetic organic insecticides, prompting a flurry of activity to investigate viable alternative products for pest management. In the quest to discover new biological insecticides, one strategy involves screening plant extracts for their toxic effects on insects. It has been shown that many plants have insecticidal activity against various insects. Several plant extracts, both those from seeds and those from leaves, have a toxic and potent growth-reducing activity against insects. Plant extracts or pure natural/synthetic compounds can have negative effects on insects in several ways, such as through toxicity, mortality, antifeedant, growth inhibition, suppression of reproductive behavior, and decreased fecundity and fertility. Based on these findings, it is likely that natural biocides derived from C. procera leaves could be utilized to combat the spread of An. Arabiensis and Cx. Quinque fasciatus [53]. The extracts had LC50 values of 550 mgl-1 for insecticidal activity [70]. While some test subjects were able to successfully inhibit egg hatching, most test subjects either did not survive to the second instar or remained in the first instar. Furthermore, the percentages were so poisonous that all third-instar larvae died within 24 h [71]. The alcoholic extract was found to be less toxic than latex in experiments involving two mosquito species. Concentrations of 109 and 387 mg/L were found to be half-lethal (LC50) for An. stephensi and Cx. quinquefasciatus, respectively. The latex of the plant had concentrations of 13 and 86 mg/L [72]. The maximum concentration of methanolic leaf extract (7%) tested resulted in a 38% reduction in M. phaseolina diameter [73]. Death rates of 86.0%, 77.6%, and 61.0% were attained after seven days of exposure to the extract at a concentration of (5 mL cm2). Mortality rates for R. dominica, on the other hand, were between 53.8% and 64.2% [74]. Using plant extracts instead of synthetic chemicals to kill off disease-spreading insects and other pests is a large step toward protecting human health and the natural world.

Anticancer activity

In 2012, there were 14.1 million new instances of cancer, 8.2 million deaths from cancer, and 32.6 million people living with cancer globally, according to figures from the International Agency for Research on Cancer. It is estimated that there would be 26 million new instances of cancer and 17 million cancer-related deaths annually by the year 2030 [144]. Consequently, there is always a need for the discovery of novel anticancer medications that are both effective and reasonably priced. For ages, one of the most vital parts of human knowledge has been the pursuit and development of medicines derived from plant raw materials. Liver cancer never developed in DL-treated mice. There were no injuries visible on these animals. The serum VEGF level of treated mice was much lower than that of untreated mice [124]. Extracts of acetate and acetone showed increased capability for killing tumor cells, with IC50 values ranging from 0.8 to 4.4 g/mL. Evaluation of in vivo anticancer activity showed that ethyl acetate and acetone, respectively, inhibited tumor growth in treated rats by 64.3% and 53.1%, with only mild, reversible toxicity to the liver and kidneys in both cases [125]. UNBS1450 01, an inhibitor of the sodium pump, has been demonstrated to have antiproliferative and cell death-inducing effects [126]. Cell death was significantly promoted by DL methanol extract and fraction 8 in Huh-7 and COS-1 cells but not in AML12 cells. Both Huh-7 and COS-1 cell lines had extensive DNA fragmentation with this event (Table 1). The oxidative homeostasis of normal rats was very different from that of rats whose colons had been genetically altered to imitate cancer. The immunoreactivity of IL-1, nitrite, MPO, TNF-, and prostaglandin E2 was also elevated in these animals. The rats' health improved after having these markers adjusted with MeDL or the antiinflammatory medication aspirin [128]. HeLa, A549, and BHK21 cells were all still alive after being exposed to copper nanoparticles at a concentration of 120 μM [131]. Leaf extract supplementation reduced the progression of postnatal phenytoin-induced damage in the rat cerebellum [139]. Both brine shrimp (LD50 10.9–65.7 g/mL) and cancer cell lines (0.05–3.9 g/mL) were extremely sensitive to these fractions [137]. The extract stimulated a growth rate of over 70% in some cell lines. Against the lung (A-549) cell line, it was 79% effective. It was also discovered that liver cell lines (Hep-2) were susceptible to the effect. The human liver cancer cell line HT-29 and the neuroblastoma cell line IMR-32 were both shown to be inhibited by the extracts in a cytotoxic manner [136]. Cell viability data suggest that C procera has the potential to be used as a drug candidate for the treatment of lung cancer, as it effectively inhibits H1299 cancer cell lines in a dose-dependent manner [130]. Phenolic compounds have antiulcer properties [64]. UNBS1450 01's anticancer potential arises from its ability to bind to the sodium pump in the cell membrane and thereby disrupt the actin cytoskeleton, induce autophagy-related cell death, suppress NF-kappaB activation, and reduce c-Myc expression in cancer cells.

Table 1 Biological activity of C. procera

Other activities

Being the fragile long bundles of thousands of axons that they are, nerves are more susceptible to injury after any kind (both endogenous and exogenous) of traumatic situation [119]. Naturally occurring therapeutically effective compounds found in local flora have a long history of use as therapeutic agents in the treatment of a wide range of diseases. Researching such compounds would open the possibility of a new treatment option for patients. Leaves significantly reduced oxidative stress and sped up functional recovery, as evidenced by improvements in behavioral parameters [119]. After ingesting either extract, the oestrous cycle was disrupted in 60% and 80% of treated rats, respectively. Ovulation was temporarily suppressed in rats due to a prolonged dioestrous period of the oestrous cycle. On the contrary, no oestrogenic activity was detected in the extracts [111]. It was reported that uterotropic and antiimplantation action was very strong (inhibition 100%) at the dose of 250 mg/kg (1/4 of LD50) [112]. Acetic acid-induced abdominal constriction was inhibited by 67.9% at 12.5 mg/kg, 85.0% at 25 mg/kg, and 99.5% at 50 mg/kg, relative to controls. Pretreatment with naloxone (1 mg/kg) at either dose of 25 (39.8%; 42% reversal) or 50 (66.6%; 99.3% reversal) had no influence on the effects of latex protein on formalin-induced nociception [113]. After 3–14 days of treatment with topical corticosteroids, antiglaucoma medications, cycloplegics, hypertonic saline, and tear supplements, 27 eyes (93 percent) were cured. After 3 months, the endothelial cell count was considerably reduced in 17 (74%) of the 23 eyes analyzed when compared to the normal fellow eye [117]. In the maximal electroshock seizure test, the chloroform extract was the most efficient (p < 0.01) anticonvulsant, decreasing the duration of the extendor phase, clonus, and the stupor phase compared to the control group [118].

Toxicity evaluation

People use therapeutic herbs all around the world, but mainly in less developed areas. They are particularly well-liked due to their low price and abundance in the region. Because they are natural, people everywhere assume that plant-based therapies are risk-free. The data, however, suggests otherwise. If the wrong ones are picked or they are not prepared properly, they can be highly hazardous. Thus, determining the safety of plant extracts is crucial. Researchers have demonstrated that a wide range of chemicals from medicinal plants have advantageous biological effects. For gauging the plant extracts' safety and establishing the tested doses, an acute toxicity study was crucial. Up to 3 g/kg of the leaf extract was safe. None of the treated animal groups demonstrated any evidence of morbidity or altered behavior during the course of the trial [64]. Supplementation with leaf extract delayed the rate of postnatal phenytoin-induced damage in the rat cerebellum [139]. Histological alterations in the testes of treated rats were attributed to the same cardiac glycosides in C. procera latex extract that were previously linked to pathological and ultrastructural kidney tubule changes in Wistar rats [143]. Aqueous suspension of DL at doses of 5, 50, and 100 mg/kg daily reduced serum levels of inflammatory mediators and liver enzymes in a dose-dependent manner while attenuating liver necro-inflammatory alterations [140]. Mice that were given different extracts orally at doses up to 1000 mg/kg did not exhibit any toxicity for 48 h or for as long as 14 days afterward. No deaths were reported, and it was determined that all extracts were safe at the levels utilized [15]. Despite receiving the maximal dose, none of the rats in the other groups perished. During a gross pathological examination, sheep who received 60 g/kg per day for 10 days displayed mild ascites, exudates on the trachea, pulmonary edema, slight liver hemorrhage, hydropericardium, flaccid heart, ulcers on the abomasum, and pale juxtamedullary cortex in their kidneys [141]. After receiving latex at doses of 1 ml/kg of body weight or 0.005 ml/kg of body weight per day intravenously or intraperitoneally, goats typically died 20 min to 4 days later. To our knowledge, neither the intramuscular nor oral administration of the incredibly low dose of latex (0.005 ml/kg body weight/day) resulted in any goat deaths [142]. At doses of total alcohol extract up to 4000 mg/kg, there were no reports of harmful effects on the liver or renal function [68]. The results of this study suggest that using latex extract in excess could have toxicological effects; as a result, only minimal amounts should be used. The basis for every medicine development or herbal composition is the evaluation of each compound's level of toxicity.

Conclusions

There is a rich trove of substances in nature that could be utilized to develop treatments for many long-term illnesses. The neuraceutical and pharmacological value of a wide range of medicinal plants and their constituents has been established. This analysis critically evaluated the existing research suggesting C. procera has therapeutic and pharmacological effects. According to the literature, Calotropis procera is used as a traditional medicine in many different cultures and has been the subject of much research into its biological properties. Its pharmacological significance meant it was an extremely powerful competitor in the medical arena. Like other plant parts, latex has been demonstrated to possess several therapeutic qualities, including antidiabetic, antiinflammatory, analgesic, hepatoprotective, antimalaria, antiulcer, anthelminthic, and anticancer effects. Preclinical investigations have already been conducted on a variety of biological activities. The latex was found to have significant biological activity, and this is due to the presence of high contents of flavonoid and polyphenol compounds. Latex must be explored further in terms of the mechanism of action of the compound, in vivo cytotoxicity, and clinical trials to obtain more conclusive evidence about its usefulness.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

LPOI:

Lipid peroxidation inhibition assay

TBARS:

Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances

DL:

Dried latex

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentrations

UNBS1450 01:

Cardiotonic steroid

LAg-NPs:

Latex silver nanoparticles

DPPH:

2,2-Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl

DDA:

Deoxyribose degradation assays

(OH–):

Determination of hydroxyl radical scavenging activity

MeDL:

Methanol extract of dried latex

CP-P:

Calotropis procera protein

TOS:

Peripheral nerve injury

TAC:

Total oxidant status

CuONPs:

Mediated synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles

MeDL:

Methanol extract dried latex

LP:

Latex protein

References

  1. Abdulrahman MD, Ali AM, Fatihah H, Khandaker MM, Mat N (2018) Traditional medicinal knowledge of Malays in Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Malay Nat J 70:349–364

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dogara AM, Hamad SW, Hama HA, Bradosty SW, Kayfi S, Al-Rawi SS, Lema AA (2022) Biological evaluation of Garcinia kola Heckel. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2022:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3837965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahmoud AD, Abba A (2021) Ethnomedicinal survey of plants used for management of inflammatory diseases in Ringim local government, Jigawa state, Nigeria. Ethnobot Res Appl 22:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abdulrahman MD, Zakariya AM, Hama HA, Hamad SW, Al-Rawi SS, Bradosty SW, Ibrahim AH (2022) Ethnopharmacology, biological evaluation, and chemical composition of Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Desf.: A Review. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2022:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4495688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva APG, Sganzerla WG, Jacomino AP, da Silva EP, Xiao J, Simal-Gandara J (2022) Chemical composition, bioactive compounds, and perspectives for the industrial formulation of health products from uvaia (Eugenia pyriformis Cambess–Myrtaceae): A comprehensive review. J Food Compos Anal 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104500

  6. Pattnaik PK, Kar D, Chhatoi H, Shahbazi S, Ghosh G, Kuanar A (2017) Chemometric profile & antimicrobial activities of leaf extract of Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea. Nat Prod Res 31:1954–1957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaudhary P, de Araújo Viana C, Ramos MV, Kumar VL (2015) Antiedematogenic and antioxidant properties of high molecular weight protein sub-fraction of Calotropis procera latex in rat. J Basic Clin Pharm 6:69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Konno K (2011) Plant latex and other exudates as plant defense systems: roles of various defense chemicals and proteins contained therein. Phytochemistry 72:1510–1530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Usman A, Onore R, Opaluwa D, Ibrahim A (2020) Phytochemical, antioxidant and cytotoxic screening of the leaves of Calotropis procera extracts. Trends Sci Technol J 5:525–528

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar S, Gupta A, Pandey AK (2013) Calotropis procera root extract has the capability to combat free radical mediated damage. Int Sch Res Notices. 2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/691372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prabha MR, VasanthaK, (2011) Antioxidant, cytotoxicity and polyphenolic content of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. Flowers. J Appl Pharm Sci 1:136–140

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roy S, Sehgal R, Padhy B, Kumar V (2005) Antioxidant and protective effect of latex of Calotropis procera against alloxan-induced diabetes in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 102:470–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramesh J, Anshul S, Jat B (2009) Analysis of antioxidant activity in extracts of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. J Appl Biosci 17:899–903

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kazemipour N, Nikbin M, Davarimanesh A, Sepehrimanesh M (2015) Antioxidant activity and mineral element contents of Calotropis procera from Iran: a traditional medicinal plant in Middle East. Comp Clin Pathol 24:1147–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rathod CP, Ghante MH (2021) Pharmacological screening of mast cell stabilizing, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activity of Calotropis procera extracts. Turk J Comput Math Educ (TURCOMAT) 12:4338–4352

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar D, Prakash D, Agrawal V, Nebapure S, Ranjan A, Jindal T (2019) Phenolic contents, antioxidant activity, free radical scavenging capacity and efficacy of Calotropis procera as bio-control agent. Indian J Agric Biochem 32:208–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Usman A, Mohammad R, Abdullahi A, Zakari A, Usman N (2021) Isolation of dihydroquercetin glycoside from the root bark of Calotropis procera and antioxidant and cytotoxic screening of the crude extracts. J Chem Soc Nigeria 46:0083–0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagda V, Gajbhiye A, Kumar D (2017) Isolation and characterization of endophytic fungi from Calotropis procera for their antioxidant activity. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 10:254–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohamed MA, Hamed MM, Ahmed WS, Abdou AM (2011) Antioxidant and cytotoxic flavonols from Calotropis procera. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 66:547–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tabassum A, Ali A, Babar R, Mahboob T (2016) Phytochemicals screening and free radical scavenging potential of leaf and flower extract of Calotropis procera. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 5:47–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neto MC, de Vasconcelos CF, Thijan VN, Caldas GF, Araujo AV, Costa-Silva JH, Amorim EL, Ferreira F, de Oliveira AF, Wanderley AG (2013) Evaluation of antihyperglycaemic activity of Calotropis procera leaves extract on streptozotocin-induced diabetes in Wistar rats. Rev Bras 23:913–919

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soobrattee MA, Neergheen V, Luximon-Ramma A, Aruoma O, Bahorun T (2005) Phenolics as potential antioxidant therapeutic agents: mechanism and actions. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 579:200–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Javed S, Khan JA, Khaliq T, Javed I, Abbas RZ (2015) Experimental evaluation of nephroprotective potential of Calotropis procera (Ait) flowers against gentamicin-induced toxicity in albino rabbits. Pak Vet J 35:222–226

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar V, Basu N (1994) Anti-inflammatory activity of the latex of Calotropis procera. J Ethnopharmacol 44:123–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Basu A, Chaudhuri AN (1991) Preliminary studies on the antiinflammatory and analgesic activities of Calotropis procera root extract. J Ethnopharmacol 31:319–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saba A, Oguntoke P, Oridupa O (2011) Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of ethanolic leaf extract of Calotropis procera. Afr J Biomed Res 14:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar VL, Pandey A, Verma S, Das P (2019) Protection afforded by methanol extract of Calotropis procera latex in experimental model of colitis is mediated through inhibition of oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory signaling. Biomed Pharmacother 109:1602–1609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdel-Mageed WM, Mohamed NH, Liu M, El-Gamal AA, Basudan OA, Ismail MA, Quinn RJ, Liu X, Zhang L, Shoreit AA (2016) Lipoxygenase inhibitors from the latex of Calotropis procera. Arch Pharm Res. 2016:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-016-0725-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Parihar G, Sharma A, Ghule S, Sharma P, Deshmukh P, Srivastava D (2011) Anti-inflammatory effect of Calotropis procera root bark extract. Asian J Pharm Life Sci 1:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar VL, Roy S (2007) Calotropis procera latex extract affords protection against inflammation and oxidative stress in Freund’s complete adjuvant-induced monoarthritis in rats. Mediat Inflamm 2007:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/47523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tour N, Talele G (2011) Anti-inflammatory and gastromucosal protective effects of Calotropis procera (Asclepiadaceae) stem bark. J Nat Med 65:598–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yesmin MN, Uddin SN, Mubassara S, Akond MA (2008) Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Calotropis procera Linn. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 4:550–553

    Google Scholar 

  33. Akhtar N, Malik A, Ali SN, Kazmit SU (1992) Proceragenin, an antibacterial cardenolide from Calotropis procera. Phytochemistry 31:2821–2824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ahmed W, Azmat R, Khan SU, Khan SM, Liaquat M, Qayyum A, Mehmood A (2018) Pharmacological studies of isolated compounds from Adhatoda vasica and Calotropis procera as an antioxidant and antimicrobial bioactive sources. Pak J Bot 50:2363–2367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shah IH, Ashraf M, Sabir IA, Manzoor MA, Malik MS, Gulzar S, Ashraf F, Iqbal J, Niu Q, Zhang Y (2022) Green synthesis and Characterization of Copper oxide nanoparticles using Calotropis procera leaf extract and their different biological potentials. J Mol Struct 1259:132696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mann A, Abalaka M, Garba S (1997) The antimicrobial activity of the leaf extracts of Calotropis procera. Biomed Lett 55:205–210

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nascimento T, Oki Y, Lima D, Almeida-Cortez J, Fernandes GW, Souza-Motta C (2015) Biodiversity of endophytic fungi in different leaf ages of Calotropis procera and their antimicrobial activity. Fungal Ecol 14:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shobowale O, Ogbulie N, Itoandon E, Oresegun M, Olatope S (2013) Phytochemical and antimicrobial evaluation of aqueous and organic extracts of Calotropis procera Ait leaf and latex. Niger Food J 31:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Joshi M, Kaur S (2013) In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of Calotropis procera, Eichhornia crassipes and Datura innoxia leaves. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 6:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kareem S, Akpan I, Ojo O (2008) Antimicrobial activities of Calotropis procera on selected pathogenic microorganisms. Afr J Biomed Res 11:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mehmood T, Arshad H, Nawaz S, Ullah A, Hafeez A, Anwar F, Ahmad MM, Iqbal M (2020) Pharmaceutical potential and phenolics profiling of leaves and bark of Calotropis procera in relation to extraction solvents. Pharm Chem J 54:631–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Morsy N, Al Sherif EA, Abdel-Rassol T (2016) Phytochemical analysis of Calotropis procera with antimicrobial activity investigation. Main Group Chem 15:267–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kawo A, Mustapha A, Abdullahi B, Rogo L, Gaiya Z, Kumurya A (2009) Phytochemical properties and antibacterial activities of the leaf and latex extracts of Calotropis procera (Ait. f.) Ait. f. Bayero J Pure Appl Sci 2:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nenaah G (2013) Antimicrobial activity of Calotropis procera Ait. (Asclepiadaceae) and isolation of four flavonoid glycosides as the active constituents. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:1255–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nenaah E, Ahmed M (2011) Antimicrobial activity of extracts and latex of Calotropis procera (Ait.) and synergistic effect with reference antimicrobials. Res J Med Plant 5:706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mohamed NH, Ismail MA, Abdel-Mageed WM, Shoreit AAM (2014) Antimicrobial activity of latex silver nanoparticles using Calotropis procera. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 4:876–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Freitas CD, Silva RO, Ramos MV, Porfírio CT, Farias DF, Sousa JS, Oliveira JP, Souza PF, Dias LP, Grangeiro TB (2020) Identification, characterization, and antifungal activity of cysteine peptidases from Calotropis procera latex. Phytochemistry 169:112163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuta F (2008) Antifungal effect of Calotropis procera stem bark on Epidermophyton flocosum and Trichophyton gypseum. Afr J Biotech 7:2116–2118

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shivkar Y, Kumar V (2003) Anthelmintic activity of latex of Calotropis procera. Pharm Biol 41:263–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Iqbal Z, Lateef M, Jabbar A, Muhammad G, Khan MN (2005) Anthelmintic activity of Calotropis procera (Ait.) Ait. F. flowers in sheep. J Ethnopharmacol 102:256–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rawat P, Singh PK, Kumar V (2017) Evidence based traditional anti-diarrheal medicinal plants and their phytocompounds. Biomed Pharmacother 96:1453–1464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kumar S, Dewan S, Sangraula H, Kumar V (2001) Anti-diarrhoeal activity of the latex of Calotropis procera. J Ethnopharmacol 76:115–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Elimam AM, Elmalik KH, Ali FS (2009) Efficacy of leaves extract of Calotropis procera Ait. (Asclepiadaceae) in controlling Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Saudi J Biol Sci 16:95–100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Sharma P, Sharma J (1999) Evaluation of in vitro schizontocidal activity of plant parts of Calotropis procera—an ethnobotanical approach. J Ethnopharmacol 68:83–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kumar VL, Padhy BM (2011) Protective effect of aqueous suspension of dried latex of Calotropis procera against oxidative stress and renal damage in diabetic rats. Biocell 35:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Nadeem M, Mumtaz MW, Danish M, Rashid U, Mukhtar H, Anwar F, Raza SA (2019) Calotropis procera: UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS based profiling of bioactives, antioxidant and anti-diabetic potential of leaf extracts and an insight into molecular docking. J Food Meas Charact 13:3206–3220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ahmad M, Gwarzo M, Anwar S (2016) Antioxidative and anti-hyperglycaemic effect of Calotropis procera in alloxan induced diabetic rats. J Med Plants Res 10:54–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Yadav SK, Nagori BP, Desai PK (2014) Pharmacological characterization of different fractions of Calotropis procera (Asclepiadaceae) in streptozotocin induced experimental model of diabetic neuropathy. J Ethnopharmacol 152:349–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rasik A, Raghubir R, Gupta A, Shukla A, Dubey M, Srivastava S, Jain H, Kulshrestha D (1999) Healing potential of Calotropis procera on dermal wounds in Guinea pigs. J Ethnopharmacol 68:261–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tsala DE, Nga N, Thiery BNM, Bienvenue MT, Theophile D (2015) Evaluation of the antioxidant activity and the healing action of the ethanol extract of Calotropis procera bark against surgical wounds. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol 4:64–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Aderounmua A, Omonisib A, Akingbasotec J, Makanjuolad M, Bejide R, Orafidiya L, Adelusolae K (2013) Wound-healing and potential anti-keloidal properties of the latex of Calotropis procera (Aiton) Asclepiadaceae in rabbits. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 10:574–579

    Google Scholar 

  62. Patil RA, Makwana AB (2015) Anti-hyperbilirubinemic and wound healing activity of aqueous extract of Calotropis procera leaves in Wistar rats. Indian J Pharmacol 47:398–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Williams R (2006) Global challenges in liver disease. Hepatology 44:521–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Shehab NG, Abu-Gharbieh E, Bayoumi FA (2015) Impact of phenolic composition on hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of four desert medicinal plants. BMC Complement Altern Med 15:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kamil N, Imran-ul-Haque HS (2014) Hepatoprotective effect of Calotropis procera in Isoniazid and Rifampicin induced hepatotoxicity. Pharmacogn J 6:9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Setty SR, Quereshi AA, Swamy AV, Patil T, Prakash T, Prabhu K, Gouda AV (2007) Hepatoprotective activity of Calotropis procera flowers against paracetamol-induced hepatic injury in rats. Fitoterapia 78:451–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Dharmani P, Palit G (2006) Exploring Indian medicinal plants for antiulcer activity. Indian J Pharmacol 38:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Awaad AA, Alkanhal HF, El-Meligy RM, Zain GM, Adri VDS, Hassan DA, Alqasoumi SI (2018) Anti-ulcerative colitis activity of Calotropis procera Linn. Saudi Pharm J 26:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Basu A, Sen T, Pal S, Mascolo N, Capasso F, Nag Chaudhuri A (1997) Studies on the antiulcer activity of the chloroform fraction of Calotropis procera root extract. Phytother Res Int J Devoted Med Sci Res Plants Plant Prod 11:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  70. Begum N, Sharma B, Pandey RS (2010) Evaluation of insecticidal efficacy of Calotropis procera and Annona squamosa ethanol extracts against Musca domestica. J Biofertilizers Biopestic 1:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ramos MV, Bandeira GdP, Freitas CDTd, Nogueira NAP, Alencar NMN, Sousa PASd, Carvalho AFU (2006) Latex constituents from Calotropis procera (R. Br.) display toxicity upon egg hatching and larvae of Aedes aegypti (Linn.). Memórias Inst Oswaldo Cruz 101:503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Shahi M, Hanafi-Bojd A, Iranshahi M, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd M (2010) Larvicidal efficacy of latex and extract of Calotropis procera (Gentianales: Asclepiadaceae) against Culex quinquefasciatus and Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Borne Dis 47:185–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Waheed N, Jabeen K, Iqbal S, Javaid A (2016) Biopesticidal activity of Calotropis procera L. against Macrophomina phaseolina. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 13:163–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Nenaah GE (2013) Potential of using flavonoids, latex and extracts from Calotropis procera (Ait.) as grain protectants against two coleopteran pests of stored rice. Ind Crops Prod 45:327–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Rani R, Sharma D, Chaturvedi M, Yadav JP (2019) Phytochemical analysis, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea. Nat Prod J 9:47–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Patel HV, Patel JD, Patel B (2014) Comparative efficacy of phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of Calotropis gigantea and Calotropis procera. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharm Res 5:107–113

    Google Scholar 

  77. Joshi R, Sharma A, Jat BL (2009) Analysis of antioxidant activity in extracts of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. J Appl Biosci 17:899–903

    Google Scholar 

  78. Naveed A, Farooq A, Sohail H, Mary CB (2011) Antioxidant and antimicrobial attributes of different solvent extracts from leaves and flowers of akk [Calotropis procera (Ait.) Ait. F.)]. J Med Plants Res 5:4879–4887

    Google Scholar 

  79. Sayed AE-DH, Mohamed NH, Ismail MA, Abdel-Mageed WM, Shoreit AA (2016) Antioxidant and antiapoptotic activities of Calotropis procera latex on Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) exposed to toxic 4-nonylphenol. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 128:189–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kenganora M, Bhaskaran M, Santhepete MN, Hukkeri VI (2017) Antioxidant potential of a toxic plant Calotropis procera R. Br. Free Radic Antioxid 7:143–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Banerjee S, Kaushik S, Tomar RS (2016) Effect of different solvents on antioxidant activity of leaf extracts of Calotropis procera and Azadirachta indica. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 10:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Kumar M, Dandapat S, Kumar A, Sinha M (2013) Phytochemical properties and antioxidant activity of Calotropis Procera (Ait.) R. Br. Br (November 11, 2013) Ecoscan Special issue 4:195–199

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ahmed M, Khan RA, Shahzaib S, Khan A, Zaif AW, Ahmed W (2014) Antifungal, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Calotropis procera. Int J Biosci 5:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mohanraj R, Usmani MA (2012) Antioxidant Activity of the Leaf Extracts of Calotropis Procera. Int J Adv Biotechnol Res 2:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  85. Banerjee S, Kaushik S, Tomar RS (2018) Efficacy Assay of Crude Leaf Extracts of Calotropis procera and Azadirachta indica for Anti-oxidant Activity. Res J Pharm Technol 11:4480–4486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Faruki MZ, Jha MK, Rahman MM, Alam M, Mazumder M, Rana MS (2011) In-vitro antioxidant and cytotoxic potential of Calotropis procera (R. br.) root. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2:2132–2135

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Gholamshahi S, Vakili MA, Shahdadi F, Salehi A (2014) Comparison of total phenols and antiradical activity of flower, leaf, fruit and latex extracts of milkweed (Calotropis procera) from Jiroft and Bam cities. Int J Biosci 4:159–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Priya S, Jenifer S (2014) In vitro antioxidant activity of Calotropis Procera. Res Rev J Pharmacol 4:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  89. Dayana K, Manasa MR (2018) Antioxidant activity of ethanolic extract of Calotropis procera root in wistar rats. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 7:2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Nikbin M, Sepehrimanesh M. Essential oil composition and antioxidant activities of Calotropis procera from Iran. In: The 5thInternational Congress of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the 13th Iranian congress of Biochemistry

  91. Bajpai S, Hooda H, Singh R, Mishra R (2018) Comparative analysis of antioxidant properties of extracts of Calotropis procera with different anti-diabetic drugs. Int J Herb Med 6:104–109

    Google Scholar 

  92. Arya S, Kumar VL (2005) Antiinflammatory efficacy of extracts of latex of Calotropis procera against different mediators of inflammation. Mediators Inflamm 2005:228–232

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Singh H, Kumar S, Dewan S, Kumar V (2000) Inflammation induced by latex of Calotropis procera—a new model to evaluate anti-inflammatory drugs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 43:219–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Ramos MV, Freitas APF, Leitão RF, Costa DV, Cerqueira GS, Martins DS, Martins CS, Alencar N, Freitas LBN, Brito GAC (2020) Anti-inflammatory latex proteins of the medicinal plant Calotropis procera: a promising alternative for oral mucositis treatment. Inflamm Res 69:951–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Shivkar YM, Kumar VL (2003) Histamine mediates the pro-inflammatory effect of latex of Calotropis procera in rats. Mediators Inflamm 12:299–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Sangraula H, Dewan S, Kumar V (2001) Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of latex of Calotropis procera in different models of inflammation. Inflammopharmacology 9:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Jain S, Sharma R, Jain R, Sharma R (1996) Antimicrobial activity of Calotropis procera. Fitoterapia 67:275–277

    Google Scholar 

  98. Bilal H, Ali I, Uddin S, Khan I, Said A, Rahman MU, Khan AM, Shah AB, Khan AA (2020) Biological evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Calotropis procera against a range of bacteria. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 9:31–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Muthuvel A, Jothibas M, Mohana V, Manoharan C (2020) Green synthesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Calotropis procera flower extract and their photocatalytic degradation and antibacterial activity. Inorg Chem Commun 119:108086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Mainasara M, Aliero B, Aliero A, Dahiru S (2011) Phytochemical and antibacterial properties of Calotropis procera (Ait) R. Br. (Sodom Apple) fruit and bark extracts. Int J Modern Bot 1:8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Goyal M, Mathur R (2011) Antimicrobial potential and Phytochemical analysis of plant extracts of Calotropis procera. Int J Drug Discov Herb Res 1:138–143

    Google Scholar 

  102. Mako G, Memon A, Mughal U, Pirzado A, Bhatti S (2012) Antibacterial effects of leaves and root extract of Calotropis procera Linn. Pak J Agri Eng Vet Sci 28:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  103. Larhsini M, Bousaid M, Lazrek H, Jana M, Amarouch H (1997) Evaluation of antifungal and molluscicidal properties of extracts of Calotropis procera. Fitoterapia 68:371–373

    Google Scholar 

  104. Al-Rowaily SL, Abd-ElGawad AM, Assaeed AM, Elgamal AM, Gendy AE-NGE, Mohamed TA, Dar BA, Mohamed TK, Elshamy AI (2020) Essential oil of Calotropis procera: Comparative chemical profiles, antimicrobial activity, and allelopathic potential on weeds. Molecules 25:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. de Freitas CDT, de SouzaLopes JL, Beltramini LM, de Oliveira RSB, Oliveira JTA, Ramos MV (2011) Osmotin from Calotropis procera latex: new insights into structure and antifungal properties. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Biomembr 1808:2501–2507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Hassan S, Bilbis F, Ladan M, Umar R, Dangoggo S, Saidu Y, Abubakar M, Faruk U (2006) Evaluation of antifungal activity and phytochemical analysis of leaves, roots and stem barks extracts of Calotropis procera (Asclepiadaceae). Pak J Biol Sci 9:2624–2629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Al-Qarawi A, Mahmoud O, Sobaih M, Haroun E, Adam S (2001) A preliminary study on the anthelmintic activity of Calotropis procera latex against Haemonchus contortus infection in Najdi sheep. Vet Res Commun 25:61–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Sharma P, Sharma J (2000) In-vitro schizonticidal screening of Calotropis procera. Fitoterapia 71:77–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Mudi S, Bukar A (2011) Anti-plasmodia activity of leaf extracts of Calotropis procera Linn. Biokemistri 23:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  110. Rahmatullah M, Sultan S, Toma T, Lucky S, Chowdhury M, Haque W, Annay E, Jahan R (2010) Effect of Cuscuta reflexa stem and Calotropis procera leaf extracts on glucose tolerance in glucose-induced hyperglycemic rats and mice. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 7:109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Circosta C, Sanogo R, Occhiuto F (2001) Effects of Calotropis procera on oestrous cycle and on oestrogenic functionality in rats. Il Farmaco 56:373–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Kamath JV, Rana A (2002) Preliminary study on antifertility activity of Calotropis procera roots in female rats. Fitoterapia 73:111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Soares PM, Lima SR, Matos SG, Andrade MM, Patrocínio MC, de Freitas CD, Ramos MV, Criddle DN, Cardi BA, Carvalho KM (2005) Antinociceptive activity of Calotropis procera latex in mice. J Ethnopharmacol 99:125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Moustafa A, Ahmed S, Nabil Z, Hussein A, Omran M (2010) Extraction and phytochemical investigation of Calotropis procera: effect of plant extracts on the activity of diverse muscles. Pharm Biol 48:1080–1190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Ahmed KM, Rana A, Dixit V (2004) Effect of Calotropis procera latex on isoproterenol induced myocardial infarction in albino rats. Phytomedicine 11:327–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Qureshi AA, Prakash T, Patil T, Swamy A, Gouda AV. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activities of flowers of Calotropis procera (Ait) R. Br. in CCl 4 induced hepatic damage, 2007.

  117. Basak SK, Bhaumik A, Mohanta A, Singhal P (2009) Ocular toxicity by latex of Calotropis procera (Sodom apple). Indian J Ophthalmol 57:232–234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Jalalpure S, Salahuddin M, Imtiyaz Shaikh M, Manvi F (2009) Anticonvulsant effects of Calotropis procera root in rats. Pharm Biol 47:162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Zafar S, Rasul A, Iqbal J, Anwar H, Imran A, Jabeen F, Shabbir A, Akram R, Maqbool J, Sajid F (2021) Calotropis procera (leaves) supplementation exerts curative effects on promoting functional recovery in a mouse model of peripheral nerve injury. Food Sci Nutr 9:5016–5027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Moursy LE (1997) Insecticidal activity of Calotropis procera extracts of the flesh fly, Sarcophaga haemorrhoidalis fallen. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 27:505–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Singh R, Mittal P, Dhiman R (2005) Laboratory study on larvicidal properties of leaf extract of Calotropis procera (Family-Asclepiadaceae) against mosquito larvae. J Commun Dis 37:109–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Morsy TA, Rahem M, Allam K (2001) Control of Musca domestica third instar larvae by the latex of Calotropis procera (Family: Asclepiadaceae). J Egypt Soc Parasitol 31:107–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Doshi H, Satodiya H, Thakur MC, Parabia F, Khan A (2011) Phytochemical screening and biological activity of Calotropis Procera (Ait). R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae) against selected bacteria and Anopheles stephansi Larvae. Proteins 3:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  124. Choedon T, Mathan G, Arya S, Kumar VL, Kumar V (2006) Anticancer and cytotoxic properties of the latex of Calotropis procera in a transgenic mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol WJG 12:2517–2522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Magalhães HI, Ferreira PM, Moura ES, Torres MR, Alves AP, Pessoa OD, Costa-Lotufo LV, Moraes MO, Pessoa C (2010) In vitro and in vivo antiproliferative activity of Calotropis procera stem extracts. An Acad Bras Ciênc 82:407–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Juncker T, Schumacher M, Dicato M, Diederich M (2009) UNBS1450 from Calotropis procera as a regulator of signaling pathways involved in proliferation and cell death. Biochem Pharmacol 78:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Sehgal R, Roy S, Kumar V (2006) Evaluation of cytotoxic potential of latex of Calotropis procera and Podophyllotoxin in Allum cepa root model. Biocell 30:9–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Kumar VL, Verma S, Das P (2022) Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effect of methanol extract of latex of Calotropis procera in rat model of colorectal cancer. J Ethnopharmacol 296:115503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2022.115503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Samy RP, Rajendran P, Li F, Anandi NM, Stiles BG, Ignacimuthu S, Sethi G, Chow VT (2012) Identification of a novel Calotropis procera protein that can suppress tumor growth in breast cancer through the suppression of NF-κB pathway. PLoS ONE 7:e48514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Olajuyin AM, Olajuyin AK, Wang Z, Zhao X, Xu Z, Zhang Q, Zhang X (2021) Anti-proliferative, antioxidant effects of methanol extract of Calotropis procera leaf on lung cancer cells (H1299) and its ameliorative effect on expression of CD146 on blood cells. Clin Phytoscience 7:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Harne S, Sharma A, Dhaygude M, Joglekar S, Kodam K, Hudlikar M (2012) Novel route for rapid biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Calotropis procera L. latex and their cytotoxicity on tumor cells. Colloids Surf B 95:284–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. de Oliveira JS, Bezerra DP, de Freitas CDT, Marinho Filho JDB, de Moraes MO, Pessoa C, Costa-Lotufo LV, Ramos MV (2007) In vitro cytotoxicity against different human cancer cell lines of laticifer proteins of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R Br. Toxicol Vitro 21:1563–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Mohamed NH, Liu M, Abdel-Mageed WM, Alwahibi LH, Dai H, Ismail MA, Badr G, Quinn RJ, Liu X, Zhang L (2015) Cytotoxic cardenolides from the latex of Calotropis procera. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 25:4615–4620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Oliveira JS, Costa-Lotufo LV, Bezerra DP, Alencar N, Marinho-Filho JDB, Figueiredo IST, Moraes MO, Pessoa C, Alves APN, Ramos MV (2010) In vivo growth inhibition of sarcoma 180 by latex proteins from Calotropis procera. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 382:139–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Ibrahim SR, Mohamed G, Shaala L, Moreno L, Banuls Y, Kiss R, Youssef D (2014) Proceraside A, a new cardiac glycoside from the root barks of Calotropis procera with in vitro anticancer effects. Nat Prod Res 28:1322–1327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Verma SK, Singh SK, Mathur A (2010) In vitro cytotoxicity of Calotropis procera and Trigonella foenum-graecum against human cancer cell lines. J Chem Pharm Res 2:861–865

    Google Scholar 

  137. Jucá TL, Ramos MV, Moreno FBMB, Viana MP, de Matos JDB, Marinho-Filho RAM, Monteiro-Moreira ACDO (2013) Insights on the phytochemical profile (cyclopeptides) and biological activities of Calotropis procera latex organic fractions. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/615454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. de Alencar NMN, da Silveira Bitencourt F, de Figueiredo IST, Luz PB, Lima-Júnior RCP, Aragão KS, Magalhães PJC, de Castro Brito GA, Ribeiro RA, de Freitas APF (2017) Side-effects of Irinotecan (CPT-11), the clinically used drug for colon cancer therapy, are eliminated in experimental animals treated with latex proteins from Calotropis procera (Apocynaceae). Phytother Res 31:312–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Imosemi I, Osinubi A, Saalu L, Olagunju JA (2010) Phenytoin-induced toxicity in the postnatal cerebellar development in rat: effect of Calotropis procera on selective biochemical and haematological variables. Int J Biol Chem Sci 4:2387–2396

    Google Scholar 

  140. Padhy B, Srivastava A, Kumar V (2007) Calotropis procera latex affords protection against carbon tetrachloride induced hepatotoxicity in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 113:498–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. de Lima JM, de Freitas FJC, Amorim RNL, Câmara ACL, Batista JS, Soto-Blanco B (2011) Clinical and pathological effects of Calotropis procera exposure in sheep and rats. Toxicon 57:183–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Samia M, Adam S, Shigidi M, Hapke H (1998) Studies on laticiferous plants: toxic effects in goats of Calotropis procera latex given by different routes of administration. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 105:425–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Akinloye A, Abatan M, Alaka O, Oke B (2002) Histomorphometric and histopathological studies on the effect of Calotropis procera (giant milkweed) on the male reproductive organs of wistar rats. Afr J Biomed Res 5:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  144. Solowey E, Lichtenstein M, Sallon S, Paavilainen H, Solowey E, Lorberboum-Galski H (2014) Evaluating medicinal plants for anticancer activity. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/721402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge Tishk International University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author searched, analyzed, and drafted the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author's information

Abdulrahman Mahmoud Dogara (PhD) is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, Tishk International University Erbil, KRG, Iraq. He has a B.Sc. (Hons) in Biology from Usmanu Danfodio University, Sokoto, Nigeria, M.Sc. in Plant Biotechnology (UTM, Malaysia) and Ph.D. degree in Plant Systematics (UniSZA Malaysia). He has many scientific publications, Journal Articles, and more than (20) conference papers.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulrahman Mahmoud Dogara.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dogara, A.M. A systematic review on the biological evaluation of Calotropis procera (Aiton) Dryand. Futur J Pharm Sci 9, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-023-00467-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-023-00467-3

Keywords