Skip to main content
Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Download PDF

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of nanoliposomes loading quercetin and 3-bromopyruvate against glioma

Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences volume 10, Article number: 7 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diffuse astrocytoma (a type of glioma) and its prevalence are matters of concern worldwide. Patients with this type of tumour have a poor prognosis because after surgical treatment, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, these tumours eventually regrow or progress. To date, there is no effective treatment that can cure affected patients. Quercetin and 3-bromopyruvate are chemical compounds that have been proven to have antitumour effects alone or in combination with other compounds. Nevertheless, combination treatments including these agents are not used for treating diffuse astrocytoma.

Methods

The use of nanoliposomes loaded with quercetin and 3-bromopyruvate as combination therapy was evaluated by treating C6 cells in vitro and in vivo (in Sprague–Dawley rat brain).

Results

The 0.5 mg/mL quercetin + 0.75 mg/mL 3-bromopyruvate combination treatment decreased the expression of the biomarkers Annexin V and Caspase-3 and inhibited tumour growth; this was consistent with the in vivo results that revealed the administration of this treatment resulted in improved animal survival.

Conclusions

The observations in the present study support the further exploration of this combination of active agents in the treatment of high-grade diffuse astrocytoma, especially in cases for which wide resection is possible.

Background

The incidence rates of all primary malignant brain tumours range from 6.10 to 8.65 per 100,000 person-years; among these tumours, 80% are diffuse gliomas and 76% are high-grade astrocytomas and glioblastomas [1]. These tumours have become issues of concern worldwide since the population will increase to 2 billion people in the next 30 years [2]. The reason for the appearance of diffuse gliomas is unclear, but the process seems to be multifactorial. Factors that contribute to the development of diffuse gliomas include population ageing, overdiagnosis, ionizing radiation, air pollution, virus infection, etc. [3, 4]. The degree of malignancy depends on location, patient age, growth rate, infiltration of healthy tissues, and the presence of established and specific molecular markers [5]. Nevertheless, in most patients with grades 3 and 4 gliomas, aggressive evolution results in poor prognosis, and risk of mortality increases one year after diagnosis [6, 7]. Despite increasing technological advances to achieve more significant tumour surgical resection, effective treatment is lacking [5, 8, 9]. Consequently, the recurrence of these tumours is frequent [10, 11]. Therefore, searching for new treatments and using more effective drugs to target tumour progression or regrowth is a significant issue in neuro-oncology [12, 13].

In vitro and in vivo studies make it possible to evaluate the efficacy of new cancer treatments. The direct administration of chemical compounds and drugs to C6 cell cultures and the intrathecal or intraperitoneal administration of these agents to tumour cell transplantation rat models are both widely used to study gliomas [14]. These models have histopathological and molecular features that are similar to those of developing adult-type diffuse gliomas in humans [15]. The pharmaceutical preparations that have been proposed for treating high-grade gliomas include formulations with nanoparticles, particularly formulations with nanoliposomes (liposomes with a radius smaller than 100 nm), which have more attractive characteristics such as enhanced bioavailability of carried substances and increased efficacy due to the active substances and liposome components [16,17,18].

Moreover, nanoliposome formulations containing quercetin (Quer, a flavonoid with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antineoplastic properties) have been shown to exert an antitumour effect against high-grade glioma [19, 20]. In recent reports, Ersoz et al. found that quercetin-loaded nanoparticles improve cytotoxic effects and antioxidant activity in C6 glioma cells [21]. Wang et al. also showed that PEGylated Quer-containing nanoparticles exert similar effects [22]. Zang et al. reviewed several Quer-containing formulations that are characterized by high encapsulation efficiency, stability, sustained release, prolonged circulation time, improved accumulation at tumour sites, and therapeutic efficiency. In addition, the authors suggested that combining quercetin with specific agents enhances the ability to detect or treat tumours [23].

One active compound that been used to treat glioblastoma is 3-bromopyruvate (3BP), which is a pyruvate-like alkylating compound that inhibits hexokinase II and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [24]. 3BP exerts effects against several tumour cells, and its cytotoxicity is associated with the induction of autophagy; however, at the doses required for 3BP to be effective against glioblastoma cells, 3BP exerts toxic effects against healthy cells, which indicates a need to administer lower doses to limit systemic adverse effects [25]. In this sense, combinations of valproate, antimycin, menadione, and other antineoplastic agents with low doses of 3BP have also been suggested as effective and safe combinations for targeting some neoplastic processes [26, 27].

Hence, in this work, a nanoliposome formulation loaded with Quer and 3BP was evaluated as a combination therapy for treating C6 glioblastoma cells in vitro and in vivo. The current observations support further exploration of this combination of active agents for the treatment of diffuse astrocytoma.

Methods

Cellular culturing and selection of cells

The rat cell-line C6 (ATCC, USA) was cultured in culture recipients of 75 cm2 with D-MEM FK12 (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12, ATCC, USA) media, supplemented with 20% horse foetal serum (HSF, ATCC, USA); 10% bovine foetal serum (BFS, ATCC, USA) and 2% antibiotic/antimycotic media (A.A., GIBCO, USA). The culture plates were kept in an incubator (Water Jacketed, Nuaire, USA) at stable condition, 5% CO2 at 35 °C for growth and propagation.

The sub-cell-cluster (Sub-C6) was obtained with serial dilutions 1:10 from the starting C6-cells. The last dilution was seeded in a 96 wells-plate/100 μL with supplemented D-MEM FK12 (20% HSF, 10% BSF, 10% A.A.). The wells with one cell were selected, then, growth to confluence. After that, sub-clusters were recovered with trypsin (Trypsin- EDTA 0.05%, cat 25,300,054, ThermoFisher) and spread into 6 well-plates and bottles of 75 cm3. The cluster with highest FOXM1 (K19 clone SC500, SantaCruz biotechnology, USA) and VEGF (C20 clone- SC152, SantaCruz biotechnology, USA) protein expression was selected.

Apoptosis-markers detection

Cells, each for treatment from C6 cluster and sub-clusters, were seeded in 24 well-plates with 5 × 104 cells each well in supplemented D-MEM FK12 (20% HSF, 10% BSF, 10% A.A.) and treated with 5.7 ng, 17.1 ng y 34.2 ng of 3BP (376,817-M, Millipore) and/or 3.8 ng, 11.4 ng and 22.8 ng of Quer (Q4951, Sigma-Aldrich) during 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. Next, cells were washed with PBS and fixed by using paraformaldehyde 2%. Treated cells were incubated with the primary antibody against Annexin V (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, mouse sc-74438) by 48 h at 4 °C and Caspase 3 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, mouse sc-56053), then with the secondary antibody Alexa 546 (anti-mouse 1:1000, cat A-11030, ThermoFisher) during 48 h a 4 °C, finally contrasted with Hoechst 33,342 (cat H3570, Invitrogen) by 20 min.

Samples from cultures were analysed with an inverted confocal microscope (Nikon Ti Eclipse with A1 through the NIS Elements v.4.5.0 software). Three photography were acquired to different fields at 20 × in each treatment. The quantification and analysis were determined by a binary mask (black and white) to discard noise or artefacts by using the Image-Fiji software (London SW7 2AZ, UK). Values considered as Caspase 3 activation and translocation by Annexin V were calculated as mean density by each cell.

Liposomal formulations preparation and characterization

10 mL of each unilamellar liposome preparation was made with a mixture of Quer and 3BP. Three different classes of liposomes were prepared: (1) control liposomes or empty liposomes, (2) low-dose liposomes (0.5 mg/ml Quer + 0.75 mg/mL 3BP) and (3) high-dose liposomes (0.75 mg/mL of Quer + 1.125 mg/mL of 3BP), based on the reverse phase evaporation method [28]. Briefly, for the formation of the lipid bilayer, 10 mg of cholesterol were dissolved in 2–3 mL of chloroform and added, together with 440 μL of phosphatidylcholine, in a conical flask with two necks (one with vacuum connection and the other with ability to place a removable filter) from 13 to 100 mm in diameter, and dried under vacuum so that the lipids remain uniformly distributed at the bottom of the flask.

Simultaneously the active ingredient was dissolved in milli-Q® water. As far as the Quer is concerned, it was dissolved in chloroform and a (1:1) proportional amount of water was added to them. Subsequently, the lipid bilayer was dissolved with 3 mL of diethyl ether and the previously dissolved active ingredient was added to this solution. The flask was then vortexed for 1 min and through immersion in a sonicator for an additional 1 min (5 s pulses). To carry out the control of liposomes, water was added instead of the active principle. Returning the flask to the vortex, a vacuum was applied for approximately 1 min, during which the ether was evaporated [29]. Maintaining erasure, 6 mL of saline solution containing 0.13% spermine was added. At this point, the preparation was evaluated by visualization (a cloudy suspension is considered adequate; the formation of lumps, inadequate). The liposome preparations obtained were filtered by extrusion, with Millipore Swinnex® membranes with 0.22 μm pore diameter (pressure 100–100 psi), to homogenize the size of the vesicles and to preserve them under sterile conditions. This suspension of liposomes was titrated with saline to a volume of 10 mL, pH 7.0.

Morphological characterization was done by means of atomic force microscopy, using a Nanos-Senterra (Bruker Optiks, Ettlingen, Germany) in the non-contact / tapping-mode; analysis was done on a plate with a maximum xy scan range of 40 × 40 µm and a z range of 8 µm. Cantilevers were standard microfabricated (POINTPROBE-PLUS® Silicon-SPM-Sensor, Nanosensors® Wetzlar-Blankenfeld, Germany). The length of the AFM tip was 200 mm, and the resonance frequency was 165 kHz. The average height and roughness of the cell surface were analysed, and images were processed by using SPIP® software (Image Metrology, Hørsholm, Denmark) as previously [30].

Animal model

Animals

Forty-two male Sprague–Dawley rats, ageing 10 weeks, and weighting 210–255 g at the start of assays, were used. They were contained in acrylic boxes (50 × 40 × 40 cm), maintained under 12:12 h light/dark cycles, with FormuLab Diet #5008 food and water ad libitum.

This protocol was evaluated by the local committee for research and ethics in health research 3601 (Registering Number: R-2012–3601-106). The surgical procedures were done in the vivarium by using all the aseptic and antiseptic protocols and materials. The project followed the local laws for animal care and the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines (available at https://arriveguidelines.org/arrive-guidelines) for avoiding suffering to involved animals.

Stereotaxic approach was done in anaesthetized animals (90 mg/kg ketamine + 10 mg/kg xylazin). Once the head was fixed, the skull was exposed a trephine was done at anteroposterior 2 mm, lateral 2 mm and deep 2 mm from bregma [31]; at this site, 2.5 × 105 or 1 × 106 cells suspended in D-MEM FK12 medium (ATCC, USA) were injected and the skin was sutured. Then, a 5-day recovery period was permitted, being at the first three days treated with antibiotics (Gentamicin 80 mg + Benzathine penicillin 1,200,000 IU) and analgesic (Tramadol dose, 10 U).

Individual and combined treatments

The animals were divided into four groups (N = 24, n = 6 per group): Control) Treated with empty liposomes; Experimental 1) Treated with liposomes + Quer (1 mg/kg of Quer); Experimental 2) Treated with liposomes + 3BP (1.5 mg/kg of 3BP) and Experimental 3) Treated with liposomes + Quer + 3BP (1 mg/kg of Quer + 1.5 mg/kg of 3BP).

Low and high combined treatments

The animals were divided into three groups (N = 18, n = 6 per group): Control) Treated with saline solution; Experimental 1) Treated with low-dose liposomes (1 mg/kg of Quer + 1.5 mg/kg of 3BP) and Experimental 2) Treated with high-dose liposomes (1.5 mg/kg of Quer + 2.25 mg/kg of 3BP).

Administration of treatments and obtaining samples

The liposomal formulations were administered 3 times, at 72 h intervals, via i.p. being the first administration on the sixth day of the implant. Finally, the animals were sacrificed three weeks after implantation, due to an overdose of pentobarbital (100 mg/kg), to obtain and dissect the brains.

Samples processing

The brains were perfused and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for posterior paraffin embedding. After that, 5 µm slices were obtained every 250 microns for tumour identification. Briefly, the slices were mounted on slides covered with poly-L-lysine (10%, P4832, Sigma), the excess paraffin was removed (55ºC, oven), and they were rehydrated (xylol, 100% alcohol, 96% and 70%, and water). Subsequently, the sections were stained with Harris haematoxylin for 5 min, rinsed with water, treated with lithium bicarbonate, and counterstained with eosin. Before mounting the slides with Entellan resin (107,960, Merck-Millipore), they were dehydrated (70%, alcohol, 96% and 100%, and xylol) [32].

The images were photographed with a NI5_Elements D (5.110064 bit, Nikon, Japan) microscope 40 × and the calculation of the tumour areas were calculated with the Image Pro7 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD 20852 USA) software. Tumour volumes were calculated with the formula:

$${\varvec{v}}\left({\mu m}^{3}\right)= \sum_{Vn}^{Vn+1}\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)*\left(250\right)*({A}_{n}+{A}_{n+1}+\sqrt{{A}_{n}*{A}_{n+1}})$$

Subsequently, the values were converted to mm3 and 75% of the volume of water was added.

Statistic analysis

The differences in the medians of Caspase 3 activation and translocation detected by Annexin V in C6-cells culture by exposure to Quer, 3BP or the combination were analysed using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test. Differences in tumour size were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U nonparametric median comparison statistical test. All performed by using the Prima STAT v 12.0 software, a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Liposomal formulations were obtained as described for similar liposome formulations that contain nanoparticles (with radii ranging from 20 to 200 nm, Fig. 1). The Quer and 3BP encapsulation efficiency was not determined, but it was estimated to be > 90%, as described in multiple previous reports of similar systems [28, 33, 34]. When in solution, the rest of the described compounds were administered as original formulations and were used in our in vivo evaluations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Morphological approach of nanoliposome formulation containing Quer and 3BP. A Three-dimensional topographic image was obtained by atomic force microscopy and shows liposomal nanoparticles. B Topographic mode view on the left. Length values are presented in the centre and are marked in cross-sectional lines of amplitude view on the right

Full size image

Effects of Quer and/or 3BP on C6 cell culture

Annexin V detection.

Decreased cell viability in the initial stage of apoptosis induction was reflected by Annexin V-stained Alexa 546-positive cells [35]. The administration of Quer to cell cultures induced significant differences in proportion of apoptotic cells, which differed with both Quer concentration and treatment time (p < 0.0001). The highest proportions of Annexin V-positive cells were observed at 12 and 72 h, and the lowest proportion of Annexin V-positive cells was observed at 6 h after treatment with all Quer concentrations (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Annexin V (as a marker of initial phase of cellular death involving cell membrane dysfunction) staining of C6-cells treated with Quer and/or 3BP. C6 cells were treated with different concentrations of Quer or 3BP, and then, the mean cell density was measured at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. A Cells treated with 3.8, 11.4 or 22.8 ng Quer. B Cells treated with 5.7, 17.1 and 34.1 ng 3BP. C Cells treated with 3.8 ng Quer + 5.7 ng 3BP, 11.4 ng Quer + 17.1 ng 3BP and 22.8 ng Quer + 34.1 ng 3BP. Significant differences were determined by the Kruskal‒Wallis test and are indicated by &p < 0.01, †p < 0.001, #p < 0.005 and *p < 0.0001

Full size image

The administration of 3BP to cell cultures induced significant differences in the proportion of Annexin 5-positive cells at all the concentrations that were tested and at all the time points that were studied (p < 0.0001). The highest proportion of Annexin V-positive cells was observed at 72 h, and the lowest proportions of Annexin V-positive cells were observed at 3, 6 and 24 h (Fig. 2B).

When both compounds were added to cell cultures, significant differences were observed in the proportions of Annexin V-positive cells at all the concentrations that were tested and at all the time intervals that were studied (p < 0.0001), except for 6 and 48 h. The highest proportions of Annexin V-positive cells were observed at 12 and 72 h, and the lowest proportion of Annexin V-positive cells was observed at 6 h (Fig. 2C).

Finally, when individual treatments were compared with the combination treatment, a higher proportion of Annexin V-positive cells was observed in the group that received the combination treatment.

Caspase 3 activation.

The apoptosis execution pathway was studied by measuring Caspase 3 activation in cultured cells as described elsewhere [36]. The administration of Quer to cell cultures induced significant differences in Caspase 3 activation, which differed with both Quer concentration and treatment time (p < 0.0001). In fact, the highest degree of Caspase 3 activation was observed at 12 h, followed by 48 and 72 h. In contrast, the lowest degree of Caspase 3 activation was observed at 6 h (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Caspase 3 (marker of apoptosis pathway) expression in C6-cells treated with Quer and/or 3BP. C6 cells were treated with different concentrations of Quer or 3BP, and then, the mean cell density was measured at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. A Cells treated with 3.8, 11.4 or 22.8 ng Quer. B Cells treated with 5.7, 17.1 and 34.1 ng 3BP. C Cells treated with 3.8 ng Quer + 5.7 ng 3BP, 11.4 ng Quer + 17.1 ng 3BP and 22.8 ng Quer + 34.1 ng 3BP. Significant differences were determined by the Kruskal‒Wallis test and are indicated by an asterisk, *p < 0.0001

Full size image

Additionally, 3BP administration to cell cultures induced significant differences in Caspase 3 activation, which differed with both Quer concentration and treatment time (p < 0.0001); these results similar to those after Quer treatment (Fig. 3B).

When both compounds were administered, significant differences were observed in the activation of Caspase 3, which differed with both concentration and treatment time (p < 0.0001), except for the 3-h timepoint. In this case, the highest degree of Caspase 3 activation was observed at 3 and 12 h, and the lowest degree of Caspase 3 activation was observed at 6 h and 12 h (Fig. 3C).

Finally, when the effects of the single treatments were compared with those of the combination treatment, the highest degree of Caspase 3 activation was observed after treatment with 3BP.

In vivo effects of liposomal formulations with combined treatment on tumour growth

A subclone of the C6 cell line was used, and the number of implanted cells that allowed the longest model survival was determined; this number of cells was used for subsequent experiments. For this experiment, intracranial tumour growth was measured in rats (n = 20) that received 1 × 105 cells (n = 10) or 2 × 105 (n = 10) cells. A placebo treatment of empty liposomes (n = 5) or saline solution (n = 5) was administered, and the experiment was continued for three weeks. One hundred per cent of the animals in the 1 × 105 cell implant group survived at 21 days; however, only 80% of the animals in the 2 × 105 cell implant group survived at 21 days (data not shown).

Subsequently, the Quer and/or 3BP individual and combination treatments that had been tested in cell cultures and had elicited the best apoptotic pathway response (11.4 ng Quer, 17.1 ng 3BP and 11.4 ng Quer + 17.1 ng 3BP) were administered.

Figure 4 shows representative tumour growth in the section with the largest area that was identified in each case. A tumour region was observed mainly in the control groups, and similar regions were observed in the groups treated with either Quer or 3BP alone; in contrast, no areas of necrosis and less angiogenesis were observed in the combination treatment group (liposomes with Quer + 3BP), and only the inoculated cells, without obvious tumour formation, was observed.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Sections of the brain from rats implanted with 2.5 × 104 C6 cells and treated with liposomes containing Quer or 3BP were stained with H&E. A Treated with empty liposomes, B treated with liposomes loaded with 0.5 mg/mL Quer, C treated with liposomes loaded with 0.75 mg/mL 3BP and D treated with liposomes loaded with 0.5 mg/mL Quer + 0.75 mg/mL 3BP. These sections were obtained from rats 3 weeks after C6 cell implantation. The arrows indicate histopathological alterations due to the tumour. Scale bar 100 µm

Full size image

Consequently, it was decided to test the combination treatment at a higher dose and to increase the cellular inoculum to further test the efficacy of the treatments.

After the administration of low and high doses of the liposomal formulations of the combination treatment, the animals were reactive, and obvious tumour formation was observed. Figure 5 shows representative tumour growth after the administration of low and high concentrations of liposomes. Smaller tumours were observed in the low-dose treatment group, but an apparent reversal of the therapeutic effect was observed in the high-dose treatment group.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of brain sections with free development of implanted C6 cells and brain sections from rats implanted with 1 × 105 C6 cells and treated with liposomes containing Quer or 3BP. Above are the entire brains, below are brain sections. All sections were stained with Haematoxylin & Eosin. A Treated with saline solution, B treated with liposomes loaded with 0.5 mg/mL Quer + 0.75 mg/mL 3BP and C treated with liposomes loaded with 0.75 mg/mL Quer + 1.125 mg/mL 3BP. These sections were obtained from rats 3 weeks after C6 cell implantation. The arrows indicate histopathological alterations due to the tumour. Scale bar 100 µm

Full size image

Figure 6 shows a plot of the mean tumour volumes in the three groups of liposome-treated animals; there was a significant decrease between the control group and the group treated with low-dose combination treatment of Quer + 3BP (p < 0.05).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Tumour volumes and effect of liposomal formulation treatment. Tumour volume from rats 3 weeks after implantation of 1 × 105 C6-cells treated with A empty liposomes, B liposomes loaded with 0.5 mg/mL Quer + 0.75 mg/mL 3BP and C liposomes loaded with 0.75 mg/mL Quer + 1.125 mg/mL 3BP. Significant differences were determined by the Kruskal‒Wallis test and are indicated by #p < 0.05

Full size image

Discussion

The increasing incidence of glioblastoma and the regrowth of tumours after gross total resection followed by adjuvant treatment with temozolomide (gold standard in chemotherapy) and radiation therapy require the development of pharmacological tools for glioblastoma treatment [37, 38].

The implantation of glial cells into rat brains has been used to model human glioma for more than four decades; effective models have been used to test different treatments that control the growth and development of these cells [39]. Auer et al. (1981) determined the number of cells necessary to obtain a reliable model by studying an implant concentration gradient; they determined that the implantation of 1 × 104 cells results in a 100% glioma formation rate [40]. In this work, we implanted 2.5 and 10 times more cells than the number originally recommended by Auer et al. because preliminary experiments in our laboratory (not shown) revealed no tumour development after implantation of the original cell number.

The aim of this study was to test a liposomal formulation of Quer and 3BP combination treatment. These two components have been separately tested as neuroprotectors and glioblastoma cell regulators, although not in a combined formulation, and they have been demonstrated to exert effects in animal glioma models [21, 26, 41,42,43,44]. Notably, the material in the liposomal formulation used to improve drug availability to neoplastic cells is a third component of this formulation. In this work, the methodology used in the formulation of liposomes assumes a high encapsulation efficiency as has been reported [28]. Originally, the encapsulation efficiency was reported > 65%, but currently is near 90% (84.7 ± 5%) [45].

Quercetin is insoluble in water due to its lipophilic property, so it has poor absorption, low bioavailability, and a limited ability to cross the BBB, therefore could not be used for the treatment of gliomas. The use of this liposome formulation increased the solubility of quercetin and guaranteed the probability of acting in the brain as well as limiting peripheral effects and reduction of drug-related toxicity [20, 33, 34, 46, 47]. In fact, several concentrations were evaluated for treating rats acting as a murine model of grade 4 astrocytoma, with the purpose of evaluating the possible therapeutic effects of adjuvant treatment after wide (implantation of 2.5 × 104 cells) or partial resection (implantation of 1.0 × 105 cells).

Anticancer properties of Quer are a consequence of different mechanisms that favour the progression of cancer cells. The antioxidant property is reflected in being an effective reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger and inhibiting lipid peroxidation; also, regulating signal transduction pathways, such as NRFB, MAPK and AMPK, as demonstrated by in vitro studies [48,49,50]. The anti-inflammatory properties are related to the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TLR4 pathway) and a decrease in the production of cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) [51, 52]. Cell cycle progression of different cancer cells is affected by the arrest of the G0/G1 and G2/M phases, because of the inhibition of cyclins, release of p53 and caspase activation [53,54,55]. The synergistic effect of Quer with different chemotherapeutic agents and with radiotherapy has been reported; these studies are complemented by the cytotoxicity of Quer in glioma cells when the late stage of autophagy is inhibited [56, 57].

The suggested mechanisms of 3BP action include decreasing ATP by disrupting the function of several cysteine-rich proteins [58, 59]. Additionally, 3BP-mediated inhibition of hexokinase II, which is involved in the survival of glioblastoma cells, has been demonstrated, probably providing additional sources of ATP in neoplastic cells [60, 61]. In addition, several reports showed increased intracellular ROS production in diverse malignancies after 3BP exposure as well as the specific pyruvilation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, which is a major intracellular biochemical mechanism, resulting in the metabolic disruption of cells and inducing apoptosis [62,63,64].

Thus, considering that tumour growth and progression are favoured by acidic microenvironments and the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that are produced during anaerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect), in which hexokinase II (HK II) degrades glucose into pyruvate, producing two molecules of ATP and various glycolytic intermediates that are fed into multiple biosynthetic pathways, it is suggested that the combined effect of this formulation is additive, as differences were observed with formulations that included only one of these compounds. 3BP can also act directly because pyruvate is converted into lactate in the cytoplasm by the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). In contrast, normal astrocytes use the combination of acute aerobic glycolysis (Crabtree effect) and slow aerobic glycolysis, favouring high glucose contents and ATP generation without affecting the integrity of the mitochondrial membrane and maintaining a balance between glycolysis and respiration [65, 66].

Annexin V, which is specifically related to the processes that are associated with the initial phases of cell death, is considered a marker of membrane dysfunction [35]. Quer administration modulated the changes in the cell cycle that are associated with the initial phase of apoptosis, as shown by the increased proportion of Annexin V-positive cells described in prostate, colorectal and other neoplastic cells [67,68,69]. 3BP administration also induced high expression of Annexin V or high proportions of Annexin V-positive cancer cells, such as was observed in melanoma and lung neoplastic cells [70, 71].

Complementarily, in this study, caspases (cysteine proteases) are considered key proteins in apoptotic processes, specifically in the execution phase. Caspase 3 expression and activation have been shown to be modulated by Quer administration in different cells [72,73,74]. Similarly, 3BP induced an increase in the Caspase 3 staining intensity in potentially different types of neoplastic (liver, lung, colorectal) cells, including glioma cells [64, 71, 75].

Regarding the formulation used (simple bilayer liposomes with charges neutralized by spermidine addition), it should be noted that the main advantages of the use of liposomes is efficient transport to the target site and evasion of natural barriers in the organism; however, other functional properties have been described in the treatment of gliomas; among these the facilitation of drug transport across the blood–brain barrier, the improvement of cellular uptake and the reduction of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) excretion of drugs, reversing of multidrug resistance, regulation of autophagocytosis and induction of apoptosis [34].

Additionally, formulations could include active protein members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. In the brain, these proteins are found in the blood‒brain barrier, the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and the blood-arachnoid barrier, while in tumour cells, the overexpression of these ABC transporters is associated with drug resistance and regulated by metabolites that are generated during aerobic glycolysis; thus, 3BP could act indirectly by inhibiting the expression of these transporters [76,77,78]. On the other hand, there are reports that Quer favours the overexpression of P-gp, which is considered a substrate of these transporters [79, 80].

It should be noted that in vitro (Annexin V and Caspase 3 expression) and in vivo (limitation of growth) results are congruent and in line with the involvement of the mechanism(s) of action linked to regulation of death cells, mainly by apoptosis. However, other mechanisms such as metabolism disorders, avoiding of drugs expulsion of neoplastic cells and limitation of vascular development could be key in the observed effect. In this sense, an interesting finding of our in vivo experiments is that the combination treatment strategy seems to inhibit vascular formation. An antiangiogenic effect of Quer (at different doses and in different formulations) has been reported in multiple in vitro and in vivo studies, including those using liposomes as carriers [41, 81,82,83,84,85]. In contrast, scarce data suggest an effect of 3BP on vascularization in tumours; truly, its effects are linked to metabolism disruption, as briefly described above. In this work, the inhibition of neovascularization by the combination treatment could be an effect of both disrupted metabolism (particularly aerobic glycolysis) and direct inhibition of the production and actions of stimulating factors, such as VEGF (Vascular endothelial growth factor) [86, 87]. Further studies are required to support or refute these hypotheses. The determination of efficient doses of each component, the exploration of additional nanoliposome formulations as well as the comparison of effects from diverse administration pathways are desirable for testing this formulation in human cells, since this would increase the potential outcomes of this study and the possible clinical application. Also, an intentioned toxicity evaluation in higher or prolonged administration (studies of posology) compared with those used in this study should be done.

Conclusions

The tested combination liposomal formulation (Quer + 3BP) inhibited the expression of the biomarkers caspase-3 and Annexin V and tumour growth, but in vivo, its administration resulted in higher animal survival and lower volumes of developed tumours than in control groups. These observations support the further exploration of these active agents in the treatment of high-grade diffuse astrocytoma. Specifically, this exploratory study suggests that postsurgical treatment with liposomes loaded with Quer 1 mg/kg + 3BP 1.5 mg/kg allows glioma inhibition in cases where wide resection is possible or slows tumour growth when partial resection is possible. Further studies are required to support these findings.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AA:

Antibiotic/antimycotic solution

BFS:

Bovine foetal serum

D-MEM FK12:

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12

FOXM1:

Forkhead Box M1

H&E:

Haematoxylin–eosin

P-gp:

P-glycoprotein

Quer:

Quercetin

3BP:

3-Bromopyruvate

Sub-C6:

Sub-cell-cluster from rat cell-line C6

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2021) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumours diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro Oncol 23(12 Suppl 2):31–3105. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GLOBAL ISSUES: Population. WHO. https://www.un.org/es/global-issues/population. Accessed 1 September 2023

  3. GBD (2016) Brain and Other CNS Cancer Collaborators (2019) Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other CNS cancer, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(4):376–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30468-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grech N, Dalli T, Mizzi S, Meilak L, Calleja N, Zrinzo A (2020) Rising incidence of glioblastoma multiforme in a well-defined population. Cureus 12(5):e8195. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cantidio FS, Gil GOB, Queiroz IN, Regalin M (2022) Glioblastoma: treatment and obstacles. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 27(4):744–753. https://doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0076

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh LE, Polacek LC, Panageas K, Reiner A, Walbert T, Thomas AA, Buthorn J, Sigler A, Prigerson HG, Applebaum AJ, Diamond EL (2022) Coping with glioblastoma: prognostic communication and prognostic understanding among patients with recurrent glioblastoma, caregivers, and oncologists. J Neurooncol 158(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04010-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rong L, Li N, Zhang Z (2022) Emerging therapies for glioblastoma: current state and future directions. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 41(1):142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-022-02349-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gatto L, Di Nunno V, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Bartolini S, Brandes AA (2022) Pharmacotherapeutic treatment of glioblastoma: where are we to date? Drugs 82(5):491–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-022-01702-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Birzu C, French P, Caccese M, Cerretti G, Idbaih A, Zagonel V, Lombardi G (2020) Recurrent glioblastoma: from molecular landscape to new treatment perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 13(1):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffau H (2012) The challenge to remove diffuse low-grade gliomas while preserving brain functions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(4):569–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1275-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu VM, Jue TR, McDonald KL, Rovin RA (2018) The survival effect of repeat surgery at glioblastoma recurrence and its trend: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 115:453-459.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. You H, Qiao H (2021) Intraoperative neuromonitoring during resection of gliomas involving eloquent areas. Front Neurol 12:658680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.658680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Janjua TI, Rewatkar P, Ahmed-Cox A, Saeed I, Mansfeld FM, Kulshreshtha R, Kumeria T, Ziegler DS, Kavallaris M, Mazzieri R, Popat A (2021) Frontiers in the treatment of glioblastoma: past, present and emerging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 171:108–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giakoumettis D, Kritis A, Foroglou N (2018) C6 cell line: the gold standard in glioma research. Hippokratia 22(3):105–112

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gieryng A, Pszczolkowska D, Bocian K, Dabrowski M, Rajan WD, Kloss M, Mieczkowski J, Kaminska B (2017) Immune microenvironment of experimental rat C6 gliomas resembles human glioblastomas. Sci Rep 7(1):17556. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17752-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brioschi A, Zenga F, Zara GP, Gasco MR, Ducati A, Mauro A (2007) Solid lipid nanoparticles: could they help to improve the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments for brain tumours? Neurol Res 29(3):324–330. https://doi.org/10.1179/016164107X187017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jnaidi R, Almeida AJ, Gonçalves LM (2020) Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers as smart drug delivery systems in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Pharmaceutics 12(9):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12090860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aparicio-Blanco J, Sanz-Arriazu L, Lorenzoni R, Blanco-Prieto MJ (2020) Glioblastoma chemotherapeutic agents used in the clinical setting and in clinical trials: nanomedicine approaches to improve their efficacy. Int J Pharm 581:119283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Formica JV, Regelson W (1995) Review of the biology of Quercetin and related bioflavonoids. Food Chem Toxicol 33(12):1061–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(95)00077-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang G, Wang JJ, Yang GY, Du SM, Zeng N, Li DS, Li RM, Chen JY, Feng JB, Yuan SH, Ye F (2012) Effects of quercetin nanoliposomes on C6 glioma cells through induction of type III programmed cell death. Int J Nanomed 7:271–280. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S26935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ersoz M, Erdemir A, Derman S, Arasoglu T, Mansuroglu B (2020) Quercetin-loaded nanoparticles enhance cytotoxicity and antioxidant activity on C6 glioma cells. Pharm Dev Technol 25(6):757–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2020.1740933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang G, Wang J, Luo J, Wang L, Chen X, Zhang L, Jiang S (2013) PEG2000-DPSE-coated quercetin nanoparticles remarkably enhanced anticancer effects through induced programed cell death on C6 glioma cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 101(11):3076–3085. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zang X, Cheng M, Zhang X, Chen X (2021) Quercetin nanoformulations: a promising strategy for tumour therapy. Food Funct 12(15):6664–6681. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1fo00851j

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davidescu M, Macchioni L, Scaramozzino G, Cristina Marchetti M, Migliorati G, Vitale R, Corcelli A, Roberti R, Castigli E, Corazzi L (2015) The energy blockers bromopyruvate and lonidamine lead GL15 glioblastoma cells to death by different p53-dependent routes. Sci Rep 5:14343. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shoshan MC (2012) 3-Bromopyruvate: targets and outcomes. J Bioenerg Biomembr 44(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-012-9419-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petricciuolo M, Davidescu M, Fettucciari K, Gatticchi L, Brancorsini S, Roberti R, Corazzi L, Macchioni L (2020) The efficacy of the anticancer 3-bromopyruvate is potentiated by antimycin and menadione by unbalancing mitochondrial ROS production and disposal in U118 glioblastoma cells. Heliyon 6(12):e05741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ishiguro Y, Kobayashi M, Ideno M, Narumi K, Furugen A, Iseki K (2018) Valproate sensitizes human glioblastoma cells to 3-bromopyruvate-induced cytotoxicity. Int J Pharm 551(1–2):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Szoka F Jr, Papahadjopoulos D (1978) Procedure for preparation of liposomes with large internal aqueous space and high capture by reverse-phase evaporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75(9):4194–4198. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.75.9.4194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Baeza I, Ibañez M, Lazcano A, Santiago C, Arguello C, Wong C, Oró J (1987) Liposomes with polyribonucleotides as model of precellular systems. Orig Life Evol Biosph 17(3–4):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02386471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Neri-Bazán RM, García-Machorro J, Méndez-Luna D, Tolentino-López LE, Martínez-Ramos F, Padilla-Martínez II, Aguilar-Faisal L, Soriano-Ursúa MA, Trujillo-Ferrara JG, Fragoso-Vázquez MJ, Barrón BL, Correa-Basurto J (2017) Design, in silico studies, synthesis and in vitro evaluation of oseltamivir derivatives as inhibitors of neuraminidase from influenza A virus H1N1. Eur J Med Chem 128:154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.01.039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paxinos G, Watson C (2007) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 6th edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bancroft JD, Gamble M (2002) Theory and practice of histological techniques. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 129

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ong SG, Ming LC, Lee KS, Yuen KH (2016) Influence of the encapsulation efficiency and size of liposome on the oral bioavailability of griseofulvin-loaded liposomes. Pharmaceutics 8(3):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics8030025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Li J, Tan T, Zhao L, Liu M, You Y, Zeng Y, Chen D, Xie T, Zhang L, Fu C, Zeng Z (2020) Recent advancements in liposome-targeting strategies for the treatment of gliomas: a systematic review. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3(9):5500–5528. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van Heerde WL, Robert-Offerman S, Dumont E, Hofstra L, Doevendans PA, Smits JF, Daemen MJ, Reutelingsperger CP (2000) Markers of apoptosis in cardiovascular tissues: focus on Annexin V. Cardiovasc Res 45(3):549–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6363(99)00396-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yardim A, Kandemir FM, Ozdemir S, Kucukler S, Comakli S, Gur C, Celik H (2020) Quercetin provides protection against the peripheral nerve damage caused by vincristine in rats by suppressing caspase 3, NF-κB, ATF-6 pathways and activating Nrf2, Akt pathways. Neurotoxicology 81:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2020.10.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis ME (2016) Glioblastoma: overview of disease and treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 20(5 Suppl):S2–S8. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.CJON.S1.2-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang H, Wang R, Yu Y, Liu J, Luo T, Fan F (2019) Glioblastoma treatment modalities besides surgery. J Cancer 10(20):4793–4806. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.32475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Grobben B, De Deyn PP, Slegers H (2002) Rat C6 glioma as experimental model system for the study of glioblastoma growth and invasion. Cell Tissue Res 310(3):257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-002-0651-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Auer RN, Del Maestro RF, Anderson R (1981) A simple and reproducible experimental in vivo glioma model. Can J Neurol Sci 8:325–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100043468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tavana E, Mollazadeh H, Mohtashami E, Modaresi SMS, Hosseini A, Sabri H, Soltani A, Javid H, Afshari AR, Sahebkar A (2020) Quercetin: A promising phytochemical for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. BioFactors 46(3):356–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim HI, Lee SJ, Choi YJ, Kim MJ, Kim TY, Ko SG (2021) Quercetin induces apoptosis in glioblastoma cells by suppressing Axl/IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway. Am J Chin Med 49(3):767–784. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X21500361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kusaczuk M, Krętowski R, Naumowicz M, Stypułkowska A, Cechowska-Pasko M (2022) A preliminary study of the effect of quercetin on cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and stress responses in glioblastoma cell lines. Int J Mol Sci 23(3):1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sheng Y, Jiang Q, Dong X, Liu J, Liu L, Wang H, Wang L, Li H, Yang X, Dong J (2020) 3-Bromopyruvate inhibits the malignant phenotype of malignantly transformed macrophages and dendritic cells induced by glioma stem cells in the glioma microenvironment via miR-449a/MCT1. Biomed Pharmacother 121:109610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Al-Samydai A, Al Qaraleh M, Al Azzam KM, Mayyas A, Nsairat H, Abu Hajleh MN, Al-Halaseh LK, Al-Karablieh N, Akour A, Alshaik F, Alshaer W (2023) Formulating co-loaded nanoliposomes with gallic acid and quercetin for enhanced cancer therapy. Heliyon 9(6):e17267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Arbain NH, Salim N, Masoumi HRF, Wong TW, Basri M, Abdul Rahman MB (2019) In vitro evaluation of the inhalable quercetin loaded nanoemulsion for pulmonary delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res 9(2):497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-018-0509-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee MK (2019) Clinical usefulness of liposomal formulations in cancer therapy: lessons from the experiences of doxorubicin. J Pharm Investig 49:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40005-018-0398-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Xu D, Hu MJ, Wang YQ, Cui YL (2019) Antioxidant activities of quercetin and its complexes for medicinal application. Molecules 24(6):1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Boots AW, Haenen GR, Bast A (2008) Health effects of quercetin: from antioxidant to nutraceutical. Eur J Pharmacol 585(2–3):325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Abarikwu SO, Pant AB, Farombi EO (2012) Dietary antioxidant, quercetin, protects sertoli-germ cell coculture from atrazine-induced oxidative damage. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 26(11):477–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.21449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen CY, Kao CL, Liu CM (2018) The cancer prevention, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidation of bioactive phytochemicals targeting the TLR4 signaling pathway. Int J Mol Sci 19(9):2729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kim HP, Mani I, Iversen L, Ziboh VA (1998) Effects of naturally-occurring flavonoids and biflavonoids on epidermal cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase from guinea-pigs. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 58(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0952-3278(98)90125-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Catanzaro D, Ragazzi E, Vianello C, Caparrotta L, Montopoli M (2015) Effect of quercetin on cell cycle and cyclin expression in ovarian carcinoma and osteosarcoma cell lines. Nat Prod Commun 10(8):1365–1368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Choi EJ, Bae SM, Ahn WS (2008) Antiproliferative effects of quercetin through cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human breast cancer MDA-MB-453 cells. Arch Pharm Res 31(10):1281–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-001-2107-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee TJ, Kim OH, Kim YH, Lim JH, Kim S, Park JW, Kwon TK (2006) Quercetin arrests G2/M phase and induces caspase-dependent cell death in U937 cells. Cancer Lett 240(2):234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2005.09.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lei CS, Hou YC, Pai MH, Lin MT, Yeh SL (2018) Effects of quercetin combined with anticancer drugs on metastasis-associated factors of gastric cancer cells: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Nutr Biochem 51:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.09.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bi Y, Shen C, Li C, Liu Y, Gao D, Shi C, Peng F, Liu Z, Zhao B, Zheng Z, Wang X, Hou X, Liu H, Wu J, Zou H, Wang K, Zhong C, Zhang J, Shi C, Zhao S (2016) Inhibition of autophagy induced by quercetin at a late stage enhances cytotoxic effects on glioma cells. Tumour Biol 37(3):3549–3560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4125-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pastorino JG, Shulga N, Hoek JB (2002) Mitochondrial binding of hexokinase II inhibits Bax-induced cytochrome c release and apoptosis. J Biol Chem 277(9):7610–7618. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109950200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen Z, Zhang H, Lu W, Huang P (2009) Role of mitochondria-associated hexokinase II in cancer cell death induced by 3-bromopyruvate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1787(5):553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Rodrigues-Ferreira C, da Silva AP, Galina A (2012) Effect of the antitumoural alkylating agent 3-bromopyruvate on mitochondrial respiration: role of mitochondrially bound hexokinase. J Bioenerg Biomembr 44(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-012-9413-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Huang Y, Ouyang F, Yang F, Zhang N, Zhao W, Xu H, Yang X (2022) The expression of Hexokinase 2 and its hub genes are correlated with the prognosis in glioma. BMC Cancer 22(1):900. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10001-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Ihrlund LS, Hernlund E, Khan O, Shoshan MC (2008) 3-Bromopyruvate as inhibitor of tumour cell energy metabolism and chemopotentiator of platinum drugs. Mol Oncol 2:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2008.01.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim JS, Ahn KJ, Kim JA, Kim HM, Lee JD, Lee JM, Kim SJ, Park JH (2008) Role of reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial dysregulation in 3-bromopyruvate induced cell death in hepatoma cells: ROS-mediated cell death by 3-BrPA. J Bioenerg Biomembr 40(6):607–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-008-9188-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ganapathy-Kanniappan S, Geschwind JF, Kunjithapatham R, Buijs M, Vossen JA, Tchernyshyov I, Cole RN, Syed LH, Rao PP, Ota S, Vali M (2009) Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is pyruvylated during 3-bromopyruvate mediated cancer cell death. Anticancer Res 29(12):4909–4918

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Barros LF, Ruminot I, San Martín A, Lerchundi R, Fernández-Moncada I, Baeza-Lehnert F (2021) Aerobic glycolysis in the brain: warburg and crabtree contra pasteur. Neurochem Res 46(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-020-02964-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Tan YQ, Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhu T, Garg M, Lobie PE, Pandey V (2021) Pandey V (2021) mitochondria: the metabolic switch of cellular oncogenic transformation. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1876(1):188534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ward AB, Mir H, Kapur N, Gales DN, Carriere PP, Singh S (2018) Quercetin inhibits prostate cancer by attenuating cell survival and inhibiting anti-apoptotic pathways. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1400-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Hashemzaei M, Delarami Far A, Yari A, Heravi RE, Tabrizian K, Taghdisi SM, Sadegh SE, Tsarouhas K, Kouretas D, Tzanakakis G, Nikitovic D, Anisimov NY, Spandidos DA, Tsatsakis AM, Rezaee R (2017) Anticancer and apoptosis-inducing effects of quercetin in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep 38(2):819–828. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Al-Ghamdi MA, Al-Enazy A, Huwait EA, Albukhari A, Harakeh S, Moselhy SS (2021) Enhancement of Annexin V in response to combination of epigallocatechin gallate and quercetin as a potent arrest the cell cycle of colorectal cancer. Braz J Biol 83:e248746. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.248746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Qin JZ, Xin H, Nickoloff BJ (2010) 3-Bromopyruvate induces necrotic cell death in sensitive melanoma cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 396(2):495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhang Q, Pan J, North PE, Yang S, Lubet RA, Wang Y, You M (2012) Aerosolized 3-bromopyruvate inhibits lung tumourigenesis without causing liver toxicity. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5(5):717–725. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nguyen TT, Tran E, Nguyen TH, Do PT, Huynh TH, Huynh H (2004) The role of activated MEK-ERK pathway in quercetin-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in A549 lung cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 25(5):647–659. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgh052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Yadav N, Tripathi AK, Parveen A (2022) PLGA-quercetin nano-formulation inhibits cancer progression via mitochondrial dependent caspase-3,7 and independent FoxO1 activation with concomitant PI3K/AKT suppression. Pharmaceutics 14(7):1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14071326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Lokman MS, Althagafi HA, Alharthi F, Habotta OA, Hassan AA, Elhefny MA, Al Sberi H, Theyab A, Mufti AH, Alhazmi A, Hawsawi YM, Khafaga AF, Gewaily MS, Alsharif KF, Albrakati A, Kassab RB (2023) Protective effect of quercetin against 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiac impairments through activating Nrf2 and inhibiting NF-κB and caspase-3 activities. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 30(7):17657–17669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23314-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Nikravesh H, Khodayar MJ, Behmanesh B, Mahdavinia M, Teimoori A, Alboghobeish S, Zeidooni L (2021) The combined effect of dichloroacetate and 3-bromopyruvate on glucose metabolism in colorectal cancer cell line, HT-29; the mitochondrial pathway apoptosis. BMC Cancer 21(1):903. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08564-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Gomez-Zepeda D, Taghi M, Scherrmann JM, Decleves X, Menet MC (2019) ABC transporters at the blood-brain interfaces, their study models, and drug delivery implications in gliomas. Pharmaceutics 12(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12010020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Martin V, Xu J, Pabbisetty SK, Alonso MM, Liu D, Lee OH, Gumin J, Bhat KP, Colman H, Lang FF, Fueyo J, Gomez-Manzano C (2009) Tie2-mediated multidrug resistance in malignant gliomas is associated with upregulation of ABC transporters. Oncogene 28(24):2358–2363. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Nakano A, Tsuji D, Miki H, Cui Q, El Sayed SM, Ikegame A, Oda A, Amou H, Nakamura S, Harada T, Fujii S, Kagawa K, Takeuchi K, Sakai A, Ozaki S, Okano K, Nakamura T, Itoh K, Matsumoto T, Abe M (2011) Glycolysis inhibition inactivates ABC transporters to restore drug sensitivity in malignant cells. PLoS ONE 6(11):e27222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Tamtaji OR, Razavi ZS, Razzaghi N, Aschner M, Barati E, Mirzaei H (2022) Quercetin and Glioma: Which signaling pathways are involved? Curr Mol Pharmacol 15(7):962–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Singh A, Patel SK, Kumar P, Das KC, Verma D, Sharma R, Tripathi T, Giri R, Martins N, Garg N (2022) Quercetin acts as a P-gp modulator via impeding signal transduction from nucleotide-binding domain to transmembrane domain. J Biomol Struct Dyn 40(10):4507–4515. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1858966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Pratheeshkumar P, Budhraja A, Son YO, Wang X, Zhang Z, Ding S, Wang L, Hitron A, Lee JC, Xu M, Chen G, Luo J, Shi X (2012) Quercetin inhibits angiogenesis mediated human prostate tumour growth by targeting VEGFR-2 regulated AKT/mTOR/P70S6K signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 7(10):e47516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Kashyap D, Tuli HS, Garg VK, Bhatnagar S, Sharma AK (2018) Ursolic acid and quercetin: promising anticancer phytochemicals with antimetastatic and antiangiogenic potential. Tumour Microenviron 1(1):9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Okumo T, Furuta A, Kimura T, Yusa K, Asano K, Sunagawa M (2021) Inhibition of angiogenic factor productions by quercetin in vitro and in vivo. Medicines (Basel) 8:22. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines8050022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhaorigetu FIM, Belal A, Badawi MHA, Abdelhady AA, Galala FMAA, El-Sharkawy A, El-Dahshan AA, Mehany ABM (2021) Antiproliferative, apoptotic effects and suppression of oxidative stress of quercetin against induced toxicity in lung cancer cells of rats: in vitro and in vivo study. J Cancer 12(17):5249–5259. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.52088

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Li J, Li Z, Gao Y, Liu S, Li K, Wang S, Gao L, Shi M, Liu Z, Han Z, Qiu Y (2021) Effect of a drug delivery system made of quercetin formulated into PEGylation liposomes on cervical carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. J Nanomater 2021:9389934. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9389934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Xu J, Wang J, Xu B, Ge H, Zhou X, Fang JY (2013) Colorectal cancer cells refractory to anti-VEGF treatment are vulnerable to glycolytic blockade due to persistent impairment of mitochondria. Mol Cancer Ther 12(5):717–724. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1016-T

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Fan T, Sun G, Sun X, Zhao L, Zhong R, Peng Y (2019) Tumour energy metabolism and potential of 3-bromopyruvate as an inhibitor of aerobic glycolysis: implications in tumour treatment. Cancers (Basel) 11(3):317. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11030317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Coordination of Health Research of-IMSS sponsored this study, with the registration number R-2012-3601-106. We thank the staff of the vivarium M. en C. Itzel Isaura Vaca Ibarra, M.V.Z. Julio García Hernández, Nurse Fabiola Ortíz Pérez and Biol. Ricardo Neftali Bravo Rodríguez by their support in the care and surgery of the animals.

Funding

This research receives a grant from Coordination of Health Research-IMSS funding (number FIS/IMSS/PROT/G12/1111).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academia de Fisiología Humana, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, Col. Casco de Santo Tomás, Del. Miguel Hidalgo, 11340, Mexico City, Mexico

    Marvin Antonio Soriano-Ursúa & Ana Lilia Ocampo-Nestor

  2. Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Neurológicas, Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Av. Cuauhtémoc, 330-4 Piso, Col. Doctores, 06720, Mexico City, Mexico

    Angélica Vega-García, Vinnitsa Buzoianu-Anguiano & Iris Angélica Feria-Romero

  3. Laboratorio de Fisiología de La Formación Reticular, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Insurgentes Sur 3877, La Fama, 14269, Mexico City, Mexico

    Joaquín Manjarrez-Marmolejo

Authors
  1. Marvin Antonio Soriano-Ursúa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angélica Vega-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinnitsa Buzoianu-Anguiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ana Lilia Ocampo-Nestor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joaquín Manjarrez-Marmolejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Iris Angélica Feria-Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The author’s contributions are follows: Conceptualization was done by MASU and IAFR; methodology was done by AVG, VBA, ALON and JMM; formal analysis was done by MASU and IAFR; investigation was done by MASU and IAFR; resources were done by IAFR; writing—original draft preparation was done by MASU and IAFR; supervision was done by IAFR; funding acquisition was done by IAFR. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Angélica Feria-Romero.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The local ethics committee evaluated this protocol (Registering Number: R-2012-3601-106). The project followed the local laws for animal care NOM-062-ZOO-1999 and the ARRIVE guidelines for avoiding suffering to involved animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soriano-Ursúa, M.A., Vega-García, A., Buzoianu-Anguiano, V. et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of nanoliposomes loading quercetin and 3-bromopyruvate against glioma. Futur J Pharm Sci 10, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-023-00575-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-023-00575-0

Keywords