Skip to main content

RP-HPLC-based phytochemical screening of different polyphenolic compounds from floral extract of four species of Saraca L. (Leguminosae)



Saraca L. is one of the treasures throve of medicinally important plants in Indian subcontinent with its four species among which two are naturally distributed. It is one of the important resources of highly active phytochemicals due to which it proclaims a legendary position from ancient medicinal practices to modern ages. The crude extracts of flowers of four species were prepared using Soxhlet apparatus in petroleum benzene, ethyl acetate and 90% methanol sequentially. RP-HPLC (reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography)-based analysis of the presence of different phytochemicals using 15 different polyphenolic phytochemical standards was done to assess and quantify different phytochemicals.


RP-HPLC-based evaluation revealed the presence different polyphenolic compounds like catechins, chlorogenic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, gallic acid, t-cinnamic acid, anthrol, p-coumaric acid, biochanin A, etc., in a considerable amount which is very crucial for the phytomedicinal field. The correlations of the presence of known phytochemicals give a basis of phytochemical correlation among the four species. The RP-HPLC chromatographic data were applied to develop the complete phytochemical coding according to the complete set of chemicals found among the species to evaluate phytochemical correlation among them in a different way. This application also produces strong evidence of distinguishing features of S. indica and S. asoca that were considered as same species by some traditional taxonomy.


Extracts of S. thaipingensis contain highest amount of polyphenolic compounds, and the lowest amount was found in S. declinata. The phytochemical relations among S. asoca and S. declinata are high, and S. indica also has close relations with them, but S. thaipingensis has distinct divergence.


Saraca, the marvel of herbal medicines, belongs to the family Leguminosae [1], sub-family Caesalpinioideae [2] and the tribe Deteriae [3], distributed through the rainforests of south and south-east Asia. Saraca along with its 11 species are known for its remarkable medicinal importance [4, 5], and the legacy has been going from the ancient period of time. The remarkable medicinal importance and the aesthetic beauty acclaimed its predominant position in the arts, sculptures, literature and ancient medicinal practices [6]. Four species of Saraca are available in India, and among them S. asoca (Roxb.) de wilde and S. indica L. were found naturally in the different tropical and sub-tropical rainforests, but S. declinata (Jack) miq. and S. thaipingensis Cantley ex Prain can only be found in artificial captivities [7]. Due to the intense medicinal importance, unscientific rearing is very common and in addition to that increasing urbanization is diminishing the natural populations of Saraca which made it as globally vulnerable species [8]. Extracts of flower of Saraca were reported to have remarkable therapeutic potentialities like anti-diabetic [9, 10], anti-ulceric [11, 12], anti-microbial [13,14,15], anti-cancerous [16], anti-mutagenic and anti-genotoxic [17]. Extract of flower of S. asoca and S. indica is reported to contain alkaloids, flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, steroids and tannins [18], anthraquinone glycosides [19]. Flower extracts of Saraca were reported to contain various kinds of highly important phytochemicals which are to be more critically evaluated. RP-HPLC (reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography)-based characterization and evaluation of different phytochemicals is more scientific and convenient technique than chemical tests and spectroscopic analysis. UPLC (ultra-performance liquid chromatography)-based analysis of ethanolic and aqueous extract of flowers of S. asoca was reported to contain gallic acid, ( +)-catechin, procyanidin-B2, (−)-epicatechin, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate and (−)-epicatechin gallate [20]. The phytochemical evaluation of the presence of catechins and gallic acid within the bark extracts of S. asoca confirmed their seasonal variability [21]. Methanolic extract of bark was reported to contain tannic acid, (−)-gallocatechin, ( +)-catechin, (−)-epigallocatechin, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate, ( +)-3’-deoxycatechin-3-O-α-L-rhamnopyranoside, (−)-3’-deoxiepicatechin-3-o-β-D-glucopyranoside, epicatechin, gallocatechin gallate, lyoniside, etc. [22]. HP-TLC (high-performance thin-layer chromatography) of the extracts of the flower of Saraca showed the presence of gallic acid [17]. HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography)-based phytochemical analysis is essential to be made for the characterization of the flower extract of Saraca.


Collection of samples and drying

Flowering inflorescences (20 days old) (Fig. 1) were collected from living plants at A.J.C Bose Indian Botanic Garden, West Bengal, India, during the flowering season (December to April) of 2015–2017, and voucher of the preserved samples (Table 1) was submitted and accessioned from BURD [23].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowering twigs of four species of Saraca L. a S. asoca, b S. declinata, c S. indica and c S. thaipingensis (1 cm scale)

Table 1 Details of plant material applied for experiment

Mature flowers and flower buds were separated from the inflorescence and placed on dry water soaking papers for drying under open, airy and shady place for 6 days. Shade dried flowers were kept at 30 °C for 5 h within hot air oven. Dried samples were grinded coarsely and kept at 6 °C for future use.


Mature flowers and flower buds were separated from the inflorescence and placed on dry water soaking papers for drying under open, airy and shady place for 6 days. Shade dried flowers were kept at 30 °C for 5 h within hot air woven. Dried flowers were grinded coarsely, and 20gm of samples was taken within cellulose thimble (80X20mm) and placed within the Soxhlet apparatus. 250 ml of petroleum benzene was poured within the Soxhlet, and the temperature was set at 30 °C. The Soxhlet was run for 72 cycles of extraction for each sample, and the extracts were collected separately in glass beakers. The thimble with the same sample was taken out and dried for 4 h at 30 °C and placed properly within cleaned Soxhlet setup, and the extraction was made with the help of ethyl acetate. Another sequence of extraction was followed from the same sample with 90% methanol. Extracts were kept within glass beakers covered with cotton cloth at 6–10 °C during which the extract became crystal dried. Dried extracts were weighed and kept at − 4 °C within separate glass micro-centrifuge tubes.

Standard used

Fifteen standards of different polyphenolic compounds were dissolved in methanol to get 1 mg/ml solution. 400 μl from each of the solution were taken into a single glass centrifuge tube.

RP-HPLC setup

RP-HPLC was established using Shimadzu chromatography system fitted with C-18 column. The system was equipped with degasser (DGU-2As), liquid chromatograph (LC-20AT), autosampler (SIL-20A), column oven (CTO-ASvp), fluorescent detector (RF-10AxL), diode array detector (SPD-M20-A), bus module (CMB-20) and fraction collector (FRC-10A).

Solvent and program setup

The reverse-phase HPLC was performed using 0.1% solution of acetic acid dissolved in Milli-Q® water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B), and the flow rate was maintained at 0.8 μl/min. The elution began with 10% of solvent B maintained from 0.01 to 2 min. It was changed from 10 to 30% from 2 to 27 min and followed by the change of concentration of solvent B from 30 to 90% from 27 to 50 min. From 50 to 52 min, the elution was increased from 90 to 100% and it was maintained to 53 min and then it was reduced to 10% till 63 min to stop. The chromatographic detection was done at 270 nm wavelength.

Preparation of samples

One milliliter of methanol was added to 2 mg of each of the dried extract of experimental samples and mixed thoroughly.

Method validation

The determination of linearity, precision and accuracy was done maintaining the ICH guidelines. The linearity was determined using aliquots of different concentrations (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1 μg/mL) of stock solutions for each of the standards. The calibration was done for each of the standards separately. The analytical method was run uninterruptedly in same day without changing stock or mobile phases, and the each of the sample was run at least six times to increase precision of the method. The precision was also determined by intra-day running of standard solution of four different concentrations. Recovery study was performed using addition of known amount standard with sample and following the run maintaining the same RP-HPLC method. % of recovery and % of RSD (relative standard deviation) were evaluated after the triplicate repetition of the study.

Run of sample

Ten microliters of each of the sample solution was placed consecutively for the analysis, and each of the report was developed with the specific software (AutoRun) equipped with the chromatographic system.

Statistical analysis

The comparison among the RP-HPLC data of flower extracts of four species of Saraca was done in the following way.

Comparative analysis based on known standards

The comparison of RP-HPLC data based on the presence and quantitative estimation of known phytochemicals was done with the help of ‘PAST 3’ software. These data were applied in principal component analysis (PCA) and similarity clustering.

Comparative analysis based on complete phytochemical data

The better resolution of chemotaxonomic relations among different species of Saraca was established applying the RP-HPLC data of complete phytochemical sets. The retention times were regarded as independent characters, and on the basis of the presence and absence of such characters, a binary data matrix was obtained. The binary data were applied in ‘PAST 3’ software for PCA and similarity clustering.

Quantification of phytochemicals

The phytochemicals present within each of the sample on the basis of known standards were quantified according to the following formula [24].

$${\rm{The~}}\;{\rm{percentage~}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{~compound = }}\frac{{{\rm{Peak}}\;{\rm{~area}}\;{\rm{~of}}\;{\rm{~sample}}}}{{{\rm{Peak}}\;{\rm{~area}}\;{\rm{~of}}\;{\rm{~standard}}}}{\rm{~ \times ~}}\frac{{{\rm{Concentration}}\;{\rm{~of~}}\;{\rm{standard}}}}{{{\rm{Concentration~}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{~sample}}}}{\rm{~ \times purity~}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{~standard}}$$


The percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) in linearity test was observed below 2, and the mean relative coefficient is 0.9997. Intra-day repeatability had provided the range of value of % RSD from 0.31 to 0.48 (n = 4). The recovery data states range from 99.48 to 99.86% for different standards with the % RSD value ranging from 0.28 to 0.39. The extractive yields of each of the fractions of four species of Saraca are given in Table 2. The mixture of 15 standards gives the chromatogram represented in Fig. 2.

Table 2 Total quantity of phytochemicals (mg/kg of plant materials)
Fig. 2
figure 2

Chromatogram representing mixture of 15 standards under study. Gallic acid (A), protocatechuic acid (B), Catechin (C), o-hydroxybenzoic acid (D), chlorogenic acid (E), vanillic acid (F), syringic acid (G), caffeic acid (H), m-hydroxybenzoic acid (I), p-coumaric acid (J), sinapic acid (K), t-ferulic acid (L), t-cinnamic acid (M), biochanin A (N) and anthrol (O)

Specification of samples

Petroleum benzene (PB) extract of the flowers of S. indica showed the presence of 90 different phytochemicals among which m-hydroxybenzoic acid was identified. In the petroleum benzene extract of flower of S. declinata, gallic acid was found to be present. The extract of flower of S. thaipingensis contained gallic acid and chlorogenic acid as important chemicals, and the extract of flower of S. asoca contained m-hydroxybenzoic acid and biochanin A as major phytochemicals. Petroleum benzene extract of flower of S. declinata, S. thaipingensis and S. asoca was found to contain total 97, 58 and 97 types of compounds, respectively (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Chromatograms of petroleum benzene extracts of four species of Saraca a S. asoca, b S. declinata, c S. indica and d S. thaipingensis

Ethyl acetate (EA) extracts of flowers of S. indica, S. declinata, S. thaipingensis and S. asoca comprised a total of 121, 110, 111 and 121 types of phytochemicals, respectively (Fig. 4). The extract of S. indica contained gallic acid, catechins, chlorogenic acid, syringic acid, caffeic acid, sinapic acid, t-ferulic acid, t-cinnamic acid and biochanin A. The extract of S. declinata was found to contain gallic acid, catechins, chlorogenic acid, m-hydroxybenzoic acid, t-ferulic acid, t-cinnamic acid, biochanin A, anthrol. S. thaipingensis contained gallic acid, syringic acid, caffeic acid, sinapic acid, t-ferulic acid, t-cinnamic acid, biochanin A. S. asoca contained gallic acid, syringic acid, t-ferulic acid, t-cinnamic acid, biochanin A and anthrol.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Chromatograms of ethyl acetate extracts of four species of Saraca a S. asoca, b S. declinata, c S. indica and d S. thaipingensis

Methanolic (90%) extracts of flowers of four species of Saraca contained 88, 82, 67 and 90 types of compounds, respectively (Fig. 5). S. indica contained gallic acid, catechins, vanillic acid. S. declinata contained gallic acid and protocatechuic acid. S. thaipingensis contained gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, caffeic acid, coumaric acid, t-ferulic acid. S. asoca contained gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, coumaric acid, sinapic acid and biochanin A.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Chromatograms of 90% methanol extracts of four species of Saraca a S. asoca, b S. declinata, c S. indica and S. thaipingensis

Phytochemical coding

Two types of phytochemical codes were used for the analysis of RP-HPLC data of the respective extracts. The phytochemical codes based on the known phytochemicals were prepared according to the quantitative data (Table 2) of different phytochemicals present in each of the species. The complete phytochemical codes were obtained from the complete set of phytochemicals present as per the chromatograms. The sum of all of the phytochemicals was estimated with the help of compilation of the chromatograph data of three fractions for each species. The comparative account of phytochemical codes was represented as binary code presented in Additional file 1: Table 5.

Quantitative evaluation

The HPLC data of the mixed standards of known concentrations (Additional file 1: Table 1 and Fig. 1) represented a standard chromatograms profile (Figs. 3, 4, 5) which was compared with the chromatograms of similar compounds present in different solvent extracts of the flowers (Additional file 1: Tables 2, 3 and 4) to prepare the complete quantitative estimation of phytochemicals present in each species (Table 2).

Statistical application of quantitative and qualitative data

The quantitative data of each of the phytochemicals gave both quantitative and qualitative expression of floral extracts of each species which was applied for statistical analysis. Figure 6a shows the comparative account of phytochemicals present within each of the species. Principal component analysis of the same data showed the chemotaxonomic distinctness of each of the species (Fig. 6c) and revealed that S. declinata and S. indica are closely related and S. thaipingensis and S. asoca are chemotaxonomically distantly related. The loading plot (Fig. 6e) showed that S. asoca is most distantly correlated with the other species of Saraca. PCA analysis of complete phytochemical data (6c) showed the close chemotaxonomic similarity between S. asoca, S. Indica and S. declinata is equally correlated with S. thaipingensis. The loading plot (Fig. 6d) showed the distinctness of S. asoca from other three species.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Statistical analysis of biochemical data among four species of Saraca a Bar graph showing quantitative and qualitative phytochemical differences, b PCA scatter plot obtained from complete phytochemical data, c PCA scatter plot obtained by applying phytochemical data based on specific studied standards, d PCA loading plot obtained by using complete phytochemical data, e PCA loading plot obtained by using phytochemical data based on known standards, f Dendrogram obtained with UPGMA analysis applying complete phytochemical data and g Dendrogram obtained applying known phytochemical data based on known standards


Dendrograms were obtained by the application of both quantitative and qualitative data obtained from RP-HPLC analyses. The dendrogram (Fig. 6f) based on known phytochemical data (Table 3) showed the relative similarity between S. declinata and S. thaipingensis, whereas in S. asoca and S. Indica were different from each other in terms of chemotaxonomic features. The dendrogram obtained with the help of quantitative and qualitative phytochemical data (Fig. 6g) showed two distinct clusters in which S. thaipingensis is out grouped and S. declinata and S. indica are more closely related as opposed to S. asoca within the same cluster.

Table 3 Binary codes representing the presence and absence of traces of standards in different species


Saraca L. is the genus with potential therapeutic importance, and both S. indica and S. asoca are used to cure many diseases in India from ancient ages. RP-HPLC-based phytochemical analysis of bark samples of S. asoca and S. indica revealed the presence of catechins and gallic acid [22, 24]. RP-HPLC-based analysis of extracts of flower is relatively new but essential since flowers of Saraca spp. had been reported as therapeutically potent [6, 14, 16, 25, 26] and have several traditional uses. Extracts of flowers were reported to contain several medicinal properties, but phytochemical evidence behind those potentialities was not recognized. Present study based on RP-HPLC analysis of floral extract comparing with 15 phytochemical standards approaches to confer the reason behind the therapeutic potentialities of flower of Saraca. Present analysis confirms the presence of protocatechuic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, coumaric acid, ferulic acid, cinnamic acid, biochanin A in different extracts of flower. The presence of gallic acid may be the responsible for the anti-fungal [27], anti-cancerous [28, 29], anti-rheumatoid arthritis [30] activities of the flower of Saraca. Protocatechuic acid is an antioxidant and is also an anti-inflammatory agent with hepatoprotective [31], anti-cytotoxic [32], anti-tumorigenic [33, 34], anti-apoptotic to neural stem cell [35], and above therapeutic potentialities are reported to be found in extracts of S. indica and S. asoca. Caffeic acid has the properties like anti-cancerous [36] potentialities. Chlorogenic acid causes the activities like anti-hypersensitiveness [37, 38] and anti-inflammatory [39]. Ferulic acid possesses dermato-protective activity [40]. P-coumaric acid is anti-tumorigenic [41]. Cinnamic acid is the precursor of many other phenolic compounds as coumaric acids, sinapic acid, ferulic acid and has perfumery and antioxidant utilities. These therapeutic activities of each phytochemical may have cumulative influence to produce the remarkable therapeutic potentialities of Saraca.

RP-HPLC can effectively detect and quantify phytoestrogenic compounds [42], and it had been proven to be present in legumes in high amount [43, 44]. Based on the previous reports of being uterogenic therapeutant, both S. indica [6] and S. asoca [10] could be presumed to be the source of phytoestrogens. Biochanin A, the isoflavone, being a potent phytoestrogenic and anti-bacterial compound [45] was targeted within the floral extracts of all of the four species of Saraca. The amount of the compound in the ethyl acetate extract of flowers of S. asoca and S. indica is considerably high.

The antioxidant potentiality of flower extracts of Saraca is reported by many authors [24, 46, 47] which is due to the presence of considerable number of polyphenolic compounds with higher quantity. It proves that the flowers of Saraca are a great commercial resource of therapeutic components.

DNA marker-based barcoding is reported to be effective in identification and to estimate the diversity of S. asoca and S. indica [24, 48]. On the other hand, palynological data are also reported [7] to distinguish these four species along with many other morphological data [49]. However, the phytochemical-based correlation among them is also very essential due to their relation with highly medicinal properties. The presence of catechins, chlorogenic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid and absence of protocatechuic acid in S. indica differ it from S. asoca. Gallic acid, t-cinnamic acid and biochanin A are common compound of these four species. The presence of vanillic acid and anthrol is the distinguishing chemotaxonomic evidence of S. indica and S. thaipingensis, respectively. Though p-coumaric acid is the essential intermediate for the biochemical cycle of other polyphenols, only S. thaipingensis and S. asoca showed its presence and the reason may either be the degradation of it during extraction or the quick conversion of it into other phytochemicals in other species.

The statistical analysis is based on the complete set of phytochemicals, and considering each of the retention time equivalent to distinct character gives an innovative and effective idea for the chemotaxonomic characterization to resolve more complex taxonomic problems. Characterization of medicinally important plants based on chemotaxonomic traits gives the exposure to the quantitative evaluation of certain phytochemicals in different species and also in different ecological variations.


The method designed was properly validated and found best suitable for the phytochemical evaluation and quantification of different polyphenolic compounds in floral extracts of plant parts. The phytochemical analysis reveals the presence of valuable phytochemicals in different extracts of flowers of four different species of Saraca, and the quantitative evaluation gives the approximate value of specific phytochemicals. The comparative basis preparation of quantitative and qualitative phytochemical coding helps to evaluate the phytochemical relations among them. The qualitative coding including all of the known and unknown data set of phytochemicals gives more comprehensive expression of relation among four species of Saraca, which properly correlates with that evaluated previously through pollen morphological data [49].

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials have been provided with the manuscript as tables and figures. Supplementary tables and figures have also been provided as additional data set.



Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography


Ultra-performance liquid chromatography


Principal component analysis


Petroleum benzene


Ethyl acetate


Relative standard deviation


Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean


  1. Aznani N, Babineau M, Bailey CD et al (2017) A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny- The Legume Phylogeny Working group (LPWG). Taxon 66(1):44–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cronquist A (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tucker SC (2000) Floral development and Homeosis in Saraca (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Deteriae). Int J Plant Sci 161(4):537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanjappa M (1992) Legumes of India. B. Sing and M. Pal Singh Publication, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  5. Santapau H, Henry AN (1973) Dictionary of flowering plants of India. New Delhi Publication and Information Directorate, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pradhan P, Joseph L, Gupta V, Chulet R, Arya H, Verma R, Bajpai A (2009) Saraca asoca (Ashoka): a review. J Chem Pharmacol Res 1(1):62–71

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sil S, Mallick T, Pal T, Mondal A, De KK, Ghosh A (2019) Pollen morphology of Indian species of Saraca L. (Leguminosae)- A threatened and legendary medicinal tree. Phyton 88(3):295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CAMP Workshops on Medicinal Plants, India (1998) Saraca asoca. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1998: e.T34623A9879360. Doi: Accessed 7 May 2022

  9. Jayakumar G, Ajithabai MD, Sreedevi S, Viswanathan PK, Remeshkumar B (2010) Ethnobotanical survey of the plants used in the treatment of diabetes. Indian J Tradit knowl 9(1):100–104

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra SB, Vijaykumar M (2014) Anti-hyperglycemic and antioxidant effect of Saraca asoca (Roxb. De Wilde) Flowers in streptozotocin-nicotinamide induced diabatic rats: a therapeutic study. J Bioanal Biomed 2:338–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maruthappan V, Shree KS (2010) Antiulcer activity of aqueous suspension of Saraca indica flower against gastric ulcers in albino rats. J Pharm Res 3(1):17–20

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirtikar KR, Basu BD (1975) Indian medicinal plant. International Book Distributors, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pal TK, Bhattacharya S, Dey A (2014) Evaluation of antioxidant activities of flower extract (fresh and dried) of Saraca indica grown in West Bengal. Int J Curr Microb Appl Sci 3(4):251–259

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaganathan R, Parasuram M, Ravindran R, Vijayaragavan DD (2017) Phytochemical screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Saraca asoca flower extract. Int J Pharm Tech 9(1):28257–28271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Acharyya S, Patra A, Bag PK (2009) Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants against enteric bacteria with particular reference to multidrug resistant Vibrio cholera. Trop J Pharm Res 8(3):231–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherin DR, Manojkumar TK (2017) Flavonoids from Saraca asoca- Ideal medication for breast cancer: a molecular simulation approach. Biomed J Sci Tech Res 1(6):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nag D, Ghosh M, Mukherjee A (2013) Antimutagenic and genoprotective effects of Saraca asoca bark extract. Toxicol Ind Health 31(8):696–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Teja M, Ramya B, Reddy SM, Sudha GJ, Janaki B, Rama S, Kumar SAR (2016) Preliminary phytochemical evaluation of Caesalpinia sappan and Saraca indica. Int J Res Pharm Chem 6(1):140–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chand DS, Aswini C, Naveena G, Kumar DS, Jyothirmai M, Kumar AR, Eswaraiah MC (2015) Phytochemical evaluation of Saraca indica, Jasminium sambac, Rubia cordifolia. Indian J Res Pharm Biotech 3(6):458–460

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dhanani T, Singh R, Kumar S (2017) Extraction optimization of gallic acid, (+)-catechin, procyanidin-B2, (–)-epicatechin, (–)-epigallocatechin gallate, and (–)-epicatechin gallate: their simultaneous identification and quantification in Saraca asoca. J Food Drug Anal 25(3):691–698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ketkar PM, Nayak SU, Pai SR, Joshi RK (2015) Monitoring seasonal variation of epicatechin and gallic acid in the bark of Saraca asoca using reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method. J Ayurveda Integr Med 6(1):29–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmad F, Mishra L, Tewari R, Gupta P, Mishra P, Shukla R (2016) Anti-infammatory flavanol glycosides from Saraca asoca bark. Nat Prod Res 30(4):489–492.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thiers B (2021) Index herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Accessed 25 Mar 2021

  24. Mohan C, Kumar SM, Naresh B et al (2017) Phytochemical studies of the endangered tree, Saraca asoca (Roxb.) De Wilde. Ann Phytomed 6(1):76–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saha J, Mitra T, Gupta K, Mukherjee S (2012) Phytoconstituents and HPTLC analysis in Saraca asoca (Roxb.) Wilde. Int J Pharm Sci 4(1):96–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bisht A, Irshad S, Rawat AKS, Dwivedi H (2017) Pharmacognostical studies on Saraca asoca (Roxb.) Willd. Flower. Trop Plant Res 4(1):153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kubo I, Xiao P, Fujita K (2001) Antifungal activity of octyl gallate: structural criteria and mode of action. Biorgan Med Chem Lett 11(3):347–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kang MS, Jang HS, Oh JS, Yang KH, Choi NK, Lim HS, Kim SM (2009) Effects of methyl gallate and gallic acid on the production of inflammatory mediators interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 by oral epithelial cells stimulated with Fusobacterium nucleatum. J Microbiol 47(6):760–767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lo C, Lai TY, Yang JS, Yang JH, Weng SW, Lin HY, Chen HY, Lin JG, Chung JG (2011) Gallic acid inhibits the migration and invasion of A375.S2 human melanoma cells through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and Ras. Melanoma Res 21(4):267–273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosas EC, Correa LB, Henriques MDG (2019) Anti-inflammatory properties of schinus terebinthifolius and its use in arthritic conditions. In: Watson RR, Preedy VR (eds) Bioactive food as dietary interventions for arthritis and related inflammatory diseases, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu CL, Wang JM, Chu CY, Cheng MT, Tseng TH (2002) In vivo protective effect of protocatechuic acid on ter-butyl hydroperoxide induced rat hepatotoxicity. Food Chem Toxicol 40(5):635–641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Babich H, Sedletcaia A, Kenigsberg B (2002) In vitro cytotoxicity of protocatechuic acid to cultured human cells from oral tissue: involvement in oxidative stress. Pharma Toxicol 91(5):245–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nakamura Y, Torikai K, Ohto Y, Murakami A, Tanaka T, Ohigashi H (2000) A simple phenolic antioxidant protocatechuic acid enhances tumor promotion and oxidative stress in female ICR mouse skin: dose- and timing-dependent enhancement and involvement of bioactivation by tyrosinase. Carcinogenesis 21(10):1899–1907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anter J, Romeo-Jimenez M, Fernandez-Bedmai Z, Villatoro-Pulido M, Analla M, Alonso-Moraga A, Munoz-Serrano A (2011) Antigenotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and apoptosis induction by apigenin, bisabolol, and protocatechuic acid. J Med Food 14(3):276–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Guan S, Ge D, Liu TQ, Ma XH, Cui ZF (2009) Protocatechuic acid promotes cell proliferation and reduces basal apoptosis in cultured neural stem cells. Toxicol In-Vitro 23(2):201–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Prasad RN, Karthikeyan S, Reddy BV (2010) Inhibitory effect of caffeic acid on cancer cell proliferation by oxidative mechanism in human HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell line. Mol Cell Biochem 349(1–2):11–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao Y, Wang J, Ballevre O, Luo H, Zhang W (2011) Antihypertensive effects and mechanisms of chlorogenic acids. Hypertens Res 35(4):370–374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Onakpoya IJ, Spencer EA, Thompson MJ, Heneghan CJ (2014) The effect of chlorogenic acid on blood pressure: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Hum Hypertens 29(2):77–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tajik N, Tajik M, Mack I, Enck P (2017) The potential effects of chlorogenic acid, the main phenolic components in coffee, on health: a comprehensive review of the literature. Eur J Nutr 56(7):2215–2244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lin FH, Lin JY, Gupta RD, Tournas JA, Burch JA, Selim MA, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Grichink JM, Zielinski J, Pinnell SR (2005) Ferulic acid stabilizes a solution of vitamins C and E and doubles its photoprotection of skin. J Investig Dermatol 125(4):826–832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kong C, Jeong C, Choi J, Kim K, Jeong J (2013) Antiangiogenic effects of p-coumaric acid in human endothelial cells. Phytother Res 27(3):317–323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Grippo AA, Xie Y, Rougeau BL, Wyatt WV (1999) Analysis of phytoestrogens by high performance liquid chromatography. J Ark Acad Sci 53(13):61–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Franke AA, Custer LJ, Cerna CM, Narala K (1994) Quantitation of phytoestrogens in legumes by HPLC. J Agric Food Chem 42(9):1905–1913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Franke AA, Custer LJ, Cerna CM, Narala K (1995) Rapid HPLC analysis of dietary phytoestrogens from legumes and from human urine. Exp Biol Med 208:18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hanski L, Genina N, Uvell H, Malinovskaja K, Gylfe A, Laaksnen T, Kolakovic R, Makila E, Salonen J, Hirvonen J, Elofsson M, Sandler N, Vuorela PM (2014) Inhibitory activity of the isoflavone Biochanin A on intracellular bacteria of genus Chlamydia and initial development of a buccal formulation. PLoS One 9(12):e115115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mishra SB, Vijayakumar K (2015) Floral morphology and HPTLC fingerprint profile of Saraca asoca (Roxb.) De Wilde (Caesalpiniaceae): a consecrated tree of India. Int Lett 43:54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jyothi A, Satyavati D (2016) HPTLC- studies of ethanolic extract of Saraca asoca. Indoam J Pharm Sci 3:191–194

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hegde S, Saini A, Hegde HV, Kholkute SD, Roy S (2018) Molecular identification of Saraca asoca from its substituents and adulterants. 3 Biotech 8(3):161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Sil S, Mallick T, De KK, Pramanik A, Ghosh A (2018) Comparative morphological study of three species of Saraca L. (Fabaceae) by the statistical approach to find out the logic of potent morphological markers. Beni-suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 7:612–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Authors are thankful to Director(s) of Botanical Survey of India for their permission and cooperation for the collection of specimens and CAL herbarium consultation. Authors thankfully acknowledge the Director of Central Instrument Facility of Bose Institute for instrument facilities.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SS, KKD and AG had equal contributions in the hypothesis, experimental work, manuscript preparation and finalization of manuscript. All the authors read and approved the manuscript for final communication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalyan K. De.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the publication of this study.

Competing interests

All authors hereby declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 RP-HPLC based phytochemical data of four species of Saraca L. Sil et al.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sil, S., De, K.K. & Ghosh, A. RP-HPLC-based phytochemical screening of different polyphenolic compounds from floral extract of four species of Saraca L. (Leguminosae). Futur J Pharm Sci 8, 41 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Phytochemical coding
  • Phytochemical screening
  • Polyphenolic compounds
  • Saraca L.