Toxicological evaluations of betulinic acid and ursolic acid; common constituents of Houttuynia cordata used as an anthelmintic by the Naga tribes in North-east India

Abstract

Background

Betulinic acid (BA) and ursolic acid (UA) are two major phytoconstituents of Houttuynia cordata Thunb., (Saururaceae) which is used as an anthelmintic in the traditional medicine system of the Nagas in Nagaland, India. This study evaluates their toxic potentials using rodent models (Swiss albino mice and Wistar rats) according to the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) guidelines. Acute and 28-day sub-acute oral toxicity studies were conducted, and evaluations were made based on biochemical, hematological, and histopathological observations.

Results

Acute oral toxicity study revealed the oral LD50 of both the test compounds to be > 2000 mg/kg in mice. Sub-acute administration of BA at 10 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) revealed a significant increase in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), urea concentrations and eosinophil and lymphocyte counts in rats. Animals administered with 10 mg/kg b.w. UA revealed elevated neutrophil count, SGOT, ALP, and urea concentrations, whereas white blood cells (WBC), lymphocyte, and platelet counts were found to be low. Histopathological examinations of body organs revealed alterations in the architecture of the liver, kidney, and spleen tissues. Notably, all these alterations were recoverable as evident in the satellite group, indicating a recovering pattern from the toxic effects caused by the oral administration of these phytocompounds.

Conclusion

Although UA and BA possess several therapeutic properties, their long-term usage can cause mild toxicity in their users. This study also paves way for evaluating the optimum effective and safe dose of these phytocompounds.

Background

Natural products serve as raw materials of drugs, and the isolated bioactive compounds have been the foundation for several known pharmaceuticals. Almost 50% of all medicines today are either derived or altered form of the active phytocompounds of therapeutic plants [1], and studies on such novel phytocompounds to treat various ailments are a rapidly growing area of research [2]. Several compounds isolated from plants include artemisinin used in malarial treatment, nitisinone used in the treatment of tyrosinaemia, galantamine for Alzheimer’s, apomorphine used in Parkinson’s disease, tiotropium used in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dronabinol, cannabidiol, and capsaicin used as pain relievers [3], and compounds such as paclitaxel, vincristine, vinblastine, and camptothecin are known to possess anti-cancer agents [4, 5].

Plants produce toxic secondary metabolites as natural defense from adverse conditions, and toxicity testing can reveal the risks that may be associated thereby, avoiding potential harmful effects when used as medicine [6]. Unregulated consumption of the medicinal plants or their compounds has been an essential part of various studies that reveal the effects, doses, and toxicity exhibiting mild to lethal effects [7]. Several compounds such as capsaicin, cycasin, genistein, and ptaquiloside used as food/supplements have been found to be carcinogenic [8]. Many isolated and derived phytocompounds have been evaluated for their potential side effects via acute and chronic studies [9,10,11]. Several compounds possessing anthelmintic efficacy such as doramectin, eprinomectin, and selamectin have also been tested for their potential toxic effects [12].

Betulinic acid (BA) is a naturally occurring pentacyclic lupane-type triterpene [13] which has been used in folk medicine for centuries [14]. It is known to possess anti-viral [15], anti-malarial [16], anti-inflammatory [17], and anthelmintic activity against Caenorhabditis elegans [18]. A toxicity study on betulin, a precursor for BA, revealed that its sub-acute oral administration did not cause toxicity in rats and dogs [19]. Also, it has been established that BA delivered in liposomes does not cause systemic toxicity in mice [20].

Ursolic acid (UA) is a pentacyclic triterpenoid (saponin) present in food and plants which is known to protect hepatocytes from ethanol toxicity [21]. It has been reported to possess anti-bacterial, hepatoprotective, immunomodulatory, anti-proliferative [22], and anti-inflammatory activities [23]. It has been known to possess anti-cancer properties as well [24]. UA is also reported to possess anti-filarial effect [25] and is effective in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [26]. A toxicity study revealed that administration of UA at a dose below 1000 mg/kg/day does not cause any toxic effects on its users [27]. However, a clinical study revealed that administration of UA liposomes causes hepatotoxicity and diarrhea [28].

BA and UA are also reported to possess nematicidal efficacy against Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Haemonchus contortus, and C. elegans [29]. They have also been proven to possess anthelmintic efficacy against Syphacia obvelata [30] and Hymenolepis diminuta [31]. BA and UA are major constituents in Houttuynia cordata Thunb., (Saururaceae) which is used as an anthelmintic in the traditional medicine system of the Nagas in Nagaland, India [32]. Since their anthelmintic potentials have been already reported by several authors, this study evaluates their toxic potentials using suitable animal models.

Material and methods

Experimental compounds

BA and UA were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Mumbai, and acetaminophen (APAP) was obtained from SD Fine Chemicals Limited, Mumbai.

Experimental animals

Five healthy female Swiss mice, about 7–8 weeks of age and weighing about 25 to 30 g, were used for acute toxicity studies, and 40 female and 40 male rats of Wistar strain, about 7–9 weeks of age and weighing about 150 to 200 g, were used for sub-acute toxicity studies. All the animals were kept in separate cages and were acclimatized to laboratory conditions. They had ad libitum access to food and water. All experiments on laboratory animals were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Animal models). Also, all experiments on animals comply with the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines.

Limit test for acute oral toxicity

Limit test was performed on 5 female Swiss mice as per the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guideline 423 [33]. In brief, a single oral dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) of test compounds in 0.5 ml vehicle phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + few drops of 1% dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) was given to a female Swiss mouse and observed for mortality. If the animal survived, four additional animals were administered the same dose at an interval of 48 h. Animals were observed for adverse signs of toxicity or mortality during the first 30 min and then periodically during the first 24 h (every 12 h with special attention given during the first 4 h). The animals were kept under observation for 2 weeks to observe for any signs of distress, toxicity, or mortality. The LD50 was predicted to be greater than 2000 mg/kg, if three or more animals survived.

Sub-acute toxicity study

The 28-day oral toxicity study was performed as per the OECD guideline 407 [34]. Accordingly, three different doses were selected for the study. Dose selection was based on the efficacy of different phytocompounds in the in vivo study. Doses that showed optimum efficacy and could show any signs of toxicity at the highest test dose were selected for the study. Hence, animals were dosed 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg b.w. of BA and UA. Animals were divided into eight groups (n = 10, 5/sex). Group 1 served as the negative control and was orally fed with the 0.5 ml vehicle (PBS+DMSO). Groups 2, 3, and 4 were orally administered 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg b.w. doses of BA and UA dissolved in DMSO. Group 5 served as the positive control and was administered APAP at 50 mg/kg b.w. Groups 6, 7, and 8 served as the satellite control, satellite group which received the highest concentration of phytocompound (10 mg/kg b.w.), and APAP group (50 mg/kg b.w.), respectively. Groups 6, 7, and 8 were kept for an additional 2 weeks to observe for any reversion or persistence from the toxic effects, if any. Animals were checked daily for general clinical signs of toxic effects or mortality, and weekly, their body weight and food and water consumption were measured. Animals from groups 1–5 were sacrificed by administering anesthesia on the 29th day and groups 6–8 were sacrificed on the 43rd day. Before the administration of anesthesia, animals were refrained from food but not water, and atropine (0.02 mg/kg; s.c) was given as prescribed anesthetic barbiturate i.p. Blood samples (2 ml) were collected from the animals through cardiac puncture and processed for hematological and serum biochemical analysis. The animals were then sacrificed by cervical dislocation quickly to ascertain less anxiety and painless death. The liver, heart, spleen, kidney, brain, adrenal glands, testes, and ovaries were removed to analyze the relative organ weights (ROW). Vital organs were washed with distilled water and preserved in Bouin’s fixative to carry out histopathological studies. Hematological analysis was performed using Alfa Basic, Swelab, Germany, a semi-auto cell counter, and biochemical analysis was performed using Synergy BIO 1904C, Euro Diagnostic Systems Pvt. Ltd., India, a semi-auto biochemistry analyzer.

Statistical analysis

All the experimental data are represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), comprising of Bonferroni's test. The p value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the statistical calculations were done using Origin Pro 8.

Results

Limit test

Administration of a single oral dose of 2000 mg/kg of BA and UA to mice did not cause any mortality during the 2-week observation period. Therefore, it can be concluded that the LD50 for both the test agents was found to be > 2000 mg/kg in mice.

Sub-acute toxicity study

Effect on body weights

Oral administration of BA (Table 1) and UA (Table 2) did not reveal any significant changes in body weights of animals from both the sexes in all the groups; also, no mortality was observed during the study.

Table 1 Effect of sub-acute oral administration of BA and APAP on body weight (g) of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Table 2 Effects of sub-acute oral administration of UA and APAP on body weight (g) of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Effects on ROW

Oral administration of BA (Table 3) and UA (Table 4) did not reveal any noticeable changes in their ROWs in both female and male animals of all the groups. However, animals administered APAP showed an increase in the ROW of the spleen.

Table 3 Effects of sub-acute oral administration of BA and APAP on ROW of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Table 4 Effects of sub-acute oral administration of UA and APAP on relative organ ROW of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Effects on biochemical parameters

The sub-acute oral administration of BA revealed a dose-dependent increase in SGOT (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase) and ALP (alkaline phosphatase) in animals of both the sexes, and the highest treated dose (10 mg/kg) showed an elevation in urea levels (Table 5). Sub-acute oral administration of UA revealed elevations in the levels of SGOT and ALP in a dose-dependent manner, whereas increased urea levels were observed in only the highest treated dose (10 mg/kg) (Table 6). All these parameters were recoverable once dosing was discontinued as evidenced by the values of the satellite group (Tables 5 and 6). Animals treated with APAP showed an increase in SGOT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase), ALP, and urea values which were however recoverable after the dosing was discontinued (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5 Effects of sub-acute oral administration of BA and APAP on selected biochemical parameters of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Table 6 Effects of sub-acute oral administration of UA and APAP on selected biochemical parameters of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Effects on hematological parameters

The oral administration of BA revealed a dose-dependent increase in lymphocyte count in all the treated groups of both the sexes and only the highest treated dose (10 mg/kg) showed elevated eosinophil count (Table 7). Animals administered with the highest dose (10 mg/kg) of UA revealed elevated neutrophil count whereas white blood cells (WBC), lymphocyte, hemoglobin (Hb), and platelet (Pl) counts were found to be low. The eosinophil count in male animals was normal whereas female animals treated with the highest dose showed decreased eosinophil count (Table 8). All the abnormal values were recoverable after dosing was discontinued as is evident in the satellite groups (Tables 7 and 8).

Table 7 Effects of sub-acute oral administration of BA and APAP on selected hematological parameters of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Table 8 Effects of sub-acute oral administration of UA and APAP on selected hematological parameters of Wistar rats (n = 5/sex)

Histopathology

The liver sections of control animals showed a normal architecture (Fig. 1a) whereas animals treated with 10 mg/kg BA showed leucocytic infiltration, sinusoidal congestion, and aggregation of inflammatory cells in portal triads (Fig. 1b). Similarly, histology of liver in animals treated with 10 mg/kg UA revealed abnormalities in the form of leucocytic infiltration, sinusoidal congestion, aggregation of inflammatory cells in portal triads, and sinusoidal dilatations (Fig. 1c). The liver tissues of animals treated with APAP revealed several histopathological alterations, such as dilation of central vein indicating backflow of circulation, leucocytic infiltration, sinusoidal congestions, and nuclear pyknosis (Fig. 1d). Kidney sections of control animals showed normal architecture (Fig. 2a). Similarly, histological kidney sections from animals treated with 10 mg/kg BA did not show any alterations in the architecture of the kidney (Fig. 2b). However, kidney sections from animals treated with 10 mg/kg UA showed distortion in renal tubules, a decrease in the glomeruli size, and a simultaneous increase in the capsular space (Fig. 2c). Likewise, administration of APAP at 50 mg/kg showed significant alterations in the treated animals, in the form of dilatation of sub-capsular space of glomeruli, reduction in the glomeruli size, multiple focal tubulo-nephritis, formation of vacuoles, and distorted renal tubules (Fig. 2d). Histology of the spleen of control group showed normal architecture (Fig. 3a). However, the spleen of animals treated with the highest test dose of BA (10 mg/kg b.w) displayed significant changes in the form of enlarged sinusoids, distorted red pulp area, and neutrophil infiltration (Fig. 3b). On the other hand, animals treated with the highest dose of UA (10 mg/kg) showed abnormal architecture in the spleen tissues in the form of enlarged sinusoids, distorted red pulp area, and neutrophil infiltration (Fig. 3c). Rats treated with 50 mg/kg APAP also showed distortions of follicular cells in pulp areas, vacuole formation, and hypercellularity in the red pulp area of the spleen tissue (Fig. 3d). Histology of the heart in control animals revealed normal architecture of the cardiac muscles, connective tissues, and myosin filaments (Fig. 4a). Also, animals administered BA (Fig. 4b), UA (Fig. 4c), and APAP (Fig. 4d) did not reveal any alterations in the histology of the heart tissue.

Fig. 1

Liver histological sections of rats in sub-acute toxicity study. a Normal control group; b 10 mg/kg BA-treated group; c 10 mg/kg UA-treated group; d 50 mg/kg APAP-treated group (× 25, H&E stained). CV—central vein, PT—portal triard, SC—sinusoidal congestion, H—histiocytes, KC—Kupffer cell, LI—leucocytic infiltration

Fig. 2

Kidney histological sections of rats in sub-acute toxicity study. a Normal control group; b 10 mg/kg BA-treated group; c 10 mg/kg UA-treated group; d 50 mg/kg APAP-treated group (× 40, H&E stained). G—glomeruli, DT—distal tubules, CS—capsular space, CT—collecting tubules, PCT—proximal convoluted tubule

Fig. 3

Spleen histological sections of rats in sub-acute toxicity study. a Normal control group; b 10 mg/kg BA-treated group; c 10 mg/kg UA-treated group; d 50 mg/kg APAP-treated group (× 25, H&E stained). WP—white pulp, RP—red pulp, SS—splenic septa, CA—central artery, V—vacuolization

Fig. 4

Heart histological sections of rats in sub-acute toxicity study. a Normal control group; b 10 mg/kg BA-treated group; c 10 mg/kg UA-treated group; d 50 mg/kg APAP-treated group (× 25, H&E stained). CM—cardiac muscle, M—myocytes, V—vacuoles

Discussion

All chemical constituents and established drugs are evaluated for their acute and repeated 28-day studies to establish their safety profile before their clinical trials and approval into mainstream pharmacology [35]. The present study revealed that the administration of BA and UA did not produce any lasting signs of toxicity or mortality in the experimental animals at 2000 mg/kg b.w. in mice. All the experimental animals were found to be healthy and normal in their behavior, breathing, posture, and food and water consumption during the experimental period and thereafter. Therefore, the oral LD50 values of both the tested compounds are established to be > 2000 mg/kg b.w. in mice. A similar study by Lu et al. (2009) also revealed that the LD50 of UA was found to be 9.26 g/kg b.w. in mice [36].

Toxicity studies are performed taking a minimum of three doses, viz. low, medium, and high, in the experimental animals, and the effects are compared with positive and negative control animals [37]. The dose which exhibits the most effects during in vivo study is usually selected as the highest dose for toxicity and is considered sufficient to identify the target organ toxicity and optimum therapeutic level is devised [38]. Hence, three doses from each test compound were selected based on in vivo studies. This study did not reveal any abnormalities in body weights, food and water consumption, and ROW in animals administered with BA and UA, and no mortality was observed. Alterations in values of serum enzymes are indicative of hepatotoxicity caused by the administration of any foreign substance [39]. The present study showed an increase in SGOT and ALP following administration of BA and UA indicating hepatocellular damage and hepatotoxicity. Also, animals administered BA and UA revealed an increase in the levels of urea suggesting mild renal toxicity. Urea is a major by-product eliminated by the kidney, and any damage to the kidneys will result in increased urea levels [40]. However, all these effects were reversible as observed in the satellite group. In contrast, a similar study by Mullauer et al. (2011) reported a completed absence of systemic toxicity by BA administered to mice up to a tested dose of 500 mg/kg b.w [20].. The hematopoietic system is one of the most sensitive targets for toxic compounds and assists in determining the toxic effects of the extract on the animal’s physiological and pathological state [41]. Oral administration of UA revealed a reduction in WBC, lymphocyte, eosinophil, and platelet counts. Similar decrease in platelet count was observed in an acute and sub-acute study on safranal where animals were administered 0.10, 0.25, and 0.50 ml/kg of safranal [42]. Animals administered BA revealed an increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts only. Although animals administered BA and UA revealed mild toxicity as observed by fluctuations in these hematological parameters, these changes were however reversible as evident in the satellite group.

The liver, kidney, spleen, and heart are primary organs affected by metabolic reactions caused by the consumption of toxic compounds [43], and hence, histopathological studies of these tissues were conducted. Animals administered BA and UA caused mild abnormalities in the liver, kidney, and spleen tissues indicating that these compounds possess toxic potentials. The heart tissue however did not show any abnormalities in animals treated with BA and UA. Similar results were reported by Wang et al. (2019) on acute and sub-acute toxicity assessment of oxyclozanide where histopathological study revealed glomerulonephritis and granular degeneration of tubular epithelium in the kidney tissue and steatosis and granular degeneration in the liver tissue of rats [44].

Conclusion

The hematological, biochemical, and histopathological studies indicate that the repeated 28-day oral administration of BA and UA caused mild toxic effects which were however reversible on their discontinuation. Further studies to determine the optimum effective and safe dose with minimal or no toxic effects needs to be carried out.